Re: [AusNOG] Do Optus layer 2 services - services support LACP?

Generically I would suggest that trying to run LACP over a carrier link is not the best idea. LACP is intended as link aggregation for the two devices that are directly connected together and so LACP packets are usually interpreted as "local" only. Most gear will give you the option to tunnel L2

Re: [AusNOG] Vocus decided to Not?

Does anyone have any more details on what actually happened ? Very hard to get through to anyone right now. Thanks. On 3 Jun 2019 16:18, "Michael J. Carmody" wrote: ….and hard down again. I guess I had nothing better to do given the rain anyway… -M *From:* AusNOG *On Behalf Of

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra and Vocus Peering

It is worded to specifically exclude peering exchanges. The "peering partner" can only advertise its OWN routes and not those from any of its own peering partners (point 5.4 of telstra doc) On 25 Oct 2018 05:13, "Mark Delany" wrote: > > I agree, both Telstra and Optus peering agreements are

Re: [AusNOG] Potential Optus outage

Yep. Lots of Optus *everything* down in VIC. 3g perhaps more widely spread than just VIC. It will be interesting to see what happened. On 25 Jun 2018 4:08 PM, "Philip Loenneker" wrote: > Hi all, > > > > We’re having issues with an Optus 1G service terminating in a Melbourne > DC. > > > > 3:24

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra mobile issues again?

Might be a market now for dual-sim 'electronic bracelets' too now :) On 23 May 2018 11:57, "Mark Currie" wrote: > There are dual SIM phones available as well.. Just sayin’ :-) > > Mark > > > > *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of

Re: [AusNOG] Pics of an NBN FTTC install

My understanding on the power side of things is that one service is enough to power it all. When more than one is active the power load is shared across all of them. On 1 Feb 2018 10:47 AM, "Matt Hare" wrote: > Looks pretty standard for a pit to me, however I

Re: [AusNOG] QoS on Internet traffic

#4 solutions. > > For option #3, Palo Alto or Forcepoint NGFW (formerly Stonesoft) might be > worth looking at. And if you have deep pockets there's always Riverbed. > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Tony Miles wrote: > > The typical example might be a customer that has five sites that we

[AusNOG] QoS on Internet traffic

Hi all, I'm not sure if anyone else is having this issue, but we are recieving an increasing number of request to give priority/preference to specific Internet traffic. Apologies in advance for the lengthy post. The typical example might be a customer that has five sites that we provide a