It may or may not be possible to fudge your shaping by, instead of reducing
Bc, increasing Tc instead.
Depending.
You'd need to know or find out what Telstra uses as Tc, and bear in mind,
shaping before a policer should be configured for Tc at most half of what
the policer is using (because
net> On Behalf Of David Fowler
Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2018 3:33 PM
To: Brad Henshaw <hen...@gmail.com>
Cc: ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] ASR 903 Shaping
Hi Brad
I think we do. Telstra pretty explicit saying this is required else “you’ll
experience degraded performance”. Their
;
>
>
> *From: *Brad Henshaw <hen...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 15:07
> *To: *David Fowler <david.fow...@datacom.com.au>
> *Cc: *"ausnog@lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog@lists.ausnog.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [AusNOG] ASR 903 Shapin
From: Brad Henshaw <hen...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 15:07
To: David Fowler <david.fow...@datacom.com.au>
Cc: "ausnog@lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog@lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] ASR 903 Shaping
Hi David,
It may be worth reviewing whether you reall
Hi David,
It may be worth reviewing whether you really need to specify Bc in your
shaper policy. It was a while ago but I recall when working with the ASR920
I found the burst values automatically calculated by IOS (without manually
specifying Bc/Be) worked pretty effectively when using 'shape
Hi folks
Does anyone know if it’s possible to enter in a lower BC value in a Shaping
policy? Seems with this platform the lowest is 6 bits… this doesn’t help
when we need to configure 4Mbps Telstra EA policies…
Maybe a different software version?
Regards,
David Fowler
Infrastructure
