NBNCo has a limit of about 1530-some-odd bytes on the VDSL link.
It's larger than the standard MTU+PPPoE headers so you can run full 1500, but
not enough to run EoMPLS/L2CKTs over it... short by about 6 bytes, so forget
about running MPLS-to-the-Edge for layer-2 on FTTN/FTTB stuff.
- Ck.
>
Do you mean baby giants? Haha!
On 26 Aug 2019, at 06:26, Damien Gardner Jnr
mailto:rend...@rendrag.net>> wrote:
As an addon to the above, they only support bridging of 2-3 MAC addresses.
Which is probably not an issue with a single device, but it's insanely annoying
if you run multiple
We are using the Netgear DM200. I am not sure about tiny jumbo frames
(is that a thing?). They seem to perform well and the main advantage for
us is there is an undocumented config page http://192.168.5.1/debug.htm
where you can force the device permanently into bridge mode - will even
survive
As an addon to the above, they only support bridging of 2-3 MAC addresses.
Which is probably not an issue with a single device, but it's insanely
annoying if you run multiple devices doing PPPOE behind a bridged modem.
So I'm curious.. What ARE folks using as a bridged VDSL modem that supports
Hi Shane,
We have tested these in our lab - the VDSL performance is acceptable.
However there are a couple of downsides...
(i) No DSL configuration
(ii) No Stats, not even line sync
(iii) Price
(iv) They use a fair bit of power, and the host mainboard must have a
clean well filtered 3.3V
impress us.
Regards,
Philip Loenneker | Senior Network Engineer | TasmaNet
-Original Message-
From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Shane Chrisp
Sent: Friday, 16 August 2019 4:19 PM
To: ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: [AusNOG] VDSL2 SFP Modem
Hi,
I just became aware of these VDSL2 SFP modems and I
Hi,
I just became aware of these VDSL2 SFP modems and I was wondering if
anyone has tried these or a similar device from another supplier in AU
and if so how they performed?
--
Regards
Shane Chrisp
2000 Computers & Networks Pty Ltd
U8, 19 Outram St, West Perth, WA 6005
Ph 08 6298 7391 Fx
