On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> As expected, the text in http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1108
> makes Debian's c99 utility behave incorrectly. FYI, I've reported a
> bug:
While I think the changes proposed for issue8 are wrong, they clearly
can't result in a bug in any c99 u
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I completely disagree on this change. Undefined behavior is useful
Likewise. That part of the changes is clearly a bad idea and should not
be applied to issue 8.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com