[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001206]: The echo that supports -n is Bell Labs Unix echo, not "BSD echo"

2018-09-04 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1206 == Reported By:kre Assigned To: ==

[1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001206]: The echo that supports -n is Bell Labs Unix echo, not "BSD echo"

2018-09-04 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1206 == Reported By:kre Assigned To: =

Status of pipefail for standardization

2018-09-04 Thread Drew DeVault
Hi there! The following ticket has been around for a while discussing the possibility of including set -o pipefail in the standard shell. I'm writing in to see if this is still under consideration - it's been some time and the issue seems well-defined. http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=789 I

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000789]: Add set -o pipefail

2018-09-04 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=789 == Reported By:weeks Assigned To:ajosey ==

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000789]: Add set -o pipefail

2018-09-04 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 08:36:09PM +, Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote: > -- > (0004102) kre (reporter) - 2018-09-04 20:36 > http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=789#c4102 > -

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0000789]: Add set -o pipefail

2018-09-04 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Tue, 4 Sep 2018 23:12:42 +0200 From:Jilles Tjoelker Message-ID: <20180904211242.gb10...@stack.nl> | I noticed this problem as well. ksh93 (93u+ 2012-08-01 from FreeBSD | ports) implements the first option, Thanks. I don't think I had a working ksh93 when I