Re: Coordination on standardizing gettext() in future POSIX

2020-01-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi Jörg, Regarding the gettext(1) program and whether it expands escape sequences by default: 1) [1] is ambiguous / self-contradictory. On one hand it says: This utility interprets C escape sequences such as \t for tab. Use \\ to print a backslash... Which sounds like they are expanded by

Re: Coordination on standardizing gettext() in future POSIX

2020-01-21 Thread Shware Systems
This is not invention, as even Solaris allows you to turn it off with -s, as you point out. It may work fine for the charsets/charmap files Solaris historically provides to have escapes active as the default, but this does not equate to it being valid for all conforming charsets, if an

Re: Coordination on standardizing gettext() in future POSIX

2020-01-21 Thread Joerg Schilling
Shware Systems wrote: > My two cents, I'm more in favor of requiring the -e ala GNU, as a byte stream > that may be an escape for the charset of one locale may be plain text in > another locale, especially when the encoding of the escape char itself > differs. This can complicate editing data

Re: [1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001309]: Clarity needed for initial value of $? at start of compound-list compound statements

2020-01-21 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:34:08 + From:Geoff Clare Message-ID: <20200121113408.GA27285@lt2.masqnet> | If we do add something, then I think that some non-normative words along | the lines of your explanation at the bottom ("to clarify that ...") | would be

Re: Coordination on standardizing gettext() in future POSIX

2020-01-21 Thread Shware Systems
My two cents, I'm more in favor of requiring the -e ala GNU, as a byte stream that may be an escape for the charset of one locale may be plain text in another locale, especially when the encoding of the escape char itself differs. This can complicate editing data files when a pot file is a

Re: Coordination on standardizing gettext() in future POSIX

2020-01-21 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bruno Haible wrote: > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > From looking at the current manuals available on Linux systems, I propose > > to > > start with the manual pages from OpenSolaris since these manual pages seem > > to > > be closer from being complete enough for the POSIX standard. > > The

Minutes of the 20th January 2020 Teleconference

2020-01-21 Thread Andrew Josey
All Enclosed are the minutes from yesterday’s call regards Andrew - Minutes of the 20th January 2020 Teleconference Austin-998 Page 1 of 1 Submitted by Andrew Josey, The Open Group. 21st January 2020 Attendees: Don Cragun, IEEE PASC OR Nick Stoughton, USENIX, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22

Re: [1003.1(2016)/Issue7+TC2 0001309]: Clarity needed for initial value of $? at start of compound-list compound statements

2020-01-21 Thread Geoff Clare
Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote, on 20 Jan 2020: > > -- > (0004743) kre (reporter) - 2020-01-20 18:37 > https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1309#c4743 >