Re: dladdr()'s second arg's type: when did it change to have an _t suffix?

2024-07-29 Thread Philip Guenther via austin-group-l at The Open Group
On Monday, July 29, 2024, Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group < austin-group-l@opengroup.org> wrote: > Philip Guenther wrote, on 28 Jul 2024: > > > > Looking at https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=993 I see the > > original proposal has the second argument's type as "Dl_info *", b

[1003.1(2024)/Issue8 0001845]: Status of the thread-safety of exit is confusing

2024-07-29 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1845 == Reported By:ralfjung Assigned To: ===

Re: dladdr()'s second arg's type: when did it change to have an _t suffix?

2024-07-29 Thread Geoff Clare via austin-group-l at The Open Group
Philip Guenther wrote, on 28 Jul 2024: > > Looking at https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=993 I see the > original proposal has the second argument's type as "Dl_info *", but > then in the final version it's been changed to "Dl_info_t *" and I > don't see any discussion on the list or in the mi