Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

Actually, apologies - forget my previous reply - the change to the fwprintf() page (for swprintf()) did happen as the resolution of that bug specified. No idea how I looked at that (I had the page still open when I went back to it just now) and failed to see that the text had been changed. But I d

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

Date:Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:54:23 -0500 From:"Rich Felker via austin-group-l at The Open Group" Message-ID: <20240117225423.gb24...@brightrain.aerifal.cx> | I went to apply the resolution of this issue to musl libc and noticed | that the corresponding issue in swpri

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 03:49:11PM +, Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group wrote: > > The following issue has been RESOLVED. > == > https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 > ==

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 == Reported By:sebor Assigned To:

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

The following issue has been UPDATED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 == Reported By:sebor Assigned To:ajosey

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

The following issue has been RESOLVED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 == Reported By:sebor Assigned To:ajose

Re: [1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Austin Group Bug Tracker wrote: ... http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 ... I was pointed at the rejected bug 761. Having read through the discussion there, while I think C could and perhaps even should change in this area, I don't entirely agree with the conclusion

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

The following issue has been set as RELATED TO issue 761. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 == Reported By:sebor Assigned To

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 == Reported By:sebor Assigned To:ajosey =

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

A NOTE has been added to this issue. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 == Reported By:sebor Assigned To:ajosey =

[1003.1(2008)/Issue 7 0001219]: snprintf reequirement to fail when n > INT_MAX conflicts with C

The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1219 == Reported By:sebor Assigned To:ajose