[Issue 8 drafts 0001754]: formula for LDBL_MAX may be incorrect, e.g. for the double-double IBM format

2023-08-22 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
The following issue has a resolution that has been APPLIED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1754 == Reported By:Vincent Lefevre As

[Issue 8 drafts 0001754]: formula for LDBL_MAX may be incorrect, e.g. for the double-double IBM format

2023-07-24 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
The following issue has been RESOLVED. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1754 == Reported By:Vincent Lefevre Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001754]: formula for LDBL_MAX may be incorrect, e.g. for the double-double IBM format

2023-07-24 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
A NOTE has been added to this issue. == https://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1754 == Reported By:Vincent Lefevre Assigned To:

[Issue 8 drafts 0001754]: formula for LDBL_MAX may be incorrect, e.g. for the double-double IBM format

2023-06-29 Thread Austin Group Bug Tracker via austin-group-l at The Open Group
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1754 == Reported By:Vincent Lefevre Assigned To: