Stephane
Comments below
> On 8 Jun 2017, at 16:51, Stephane Chazelas
> wrote:
>
> 2017-06-08 15:28:49 +0100, Geoff Clare:
>> Stephane Chazelas wrote, on 08 Jun 2017:
>>>
>>> BTW, are older (than SUSv1) versions of POSIX available
>>> somewhere?
>>
>> All previous versions were only distribu
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> 2017-06-08 15:28:49 +0100, Geoff Clare:
> > Stephane Chazelas wrote, on 08 Jun 2017:
> > >
> > > BTW, are older (than SUSv1) versions of POSIX available
> > > somewhere?
> >
> > All previous versions were only distributed on paper.
>
> OK. Does any
: s/2013/2016/g at
https://www.opengroup.org/austin/papers/posix_faq.html)
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> 2017-06-08 15:28:49 +0100, Geoff Clare:
> > Stephane Chazelas wrote, on 08 Jun 2017:
> > >
> > > BTW, are older (than SUSv1) versions o
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Joe Gwinn wrote:
> Joseph M,
>
> What will you do with this old standard?
I routinely use these standards for reference for implementation work
(since in practice implementations deal with multiple standard versions,
not just the latest), as well as for understanding the hi
2017-06-08 22:15:57 +, Joe Gwinn:
[...]
> What will you do with this old standard?
[...]
In my case, it's only for personal interest, archaeological
purposes, to answer questions like:
- when was that added to which standard?
- is feature X a POSIX invention?
- was feature Y in implementation
