Hi, thanks for all your replies and suggestions, unfortunately i dont see a
clear path ahead. ill have to think longer on this.
Glenn
Hi, Glenn!
> Hi, im trying to make a project im involved with
> (http://busybox.lineo.com/) more portable, specifically i want to make it
> compile under GNU/Hurd as well as linux.
NetBSD and QNX (Neutrino and classic 4.x) would be the real challenge -
they are widely applied in embedded systems
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:04:10AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hello Glenn,
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:53:03PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> > 1) [...] there needs to be a way to only compile [libbb] functions that
> > will work on the target machine.
>
> That is really autoconf's ra
Hello Glenn,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:53:03PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> 1) all libbb files are compiled, however some have system calls that
> obviously depend on the linux kernel (and other portability problems),
> there needs to be a way to only compile functions that will work on the
>
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:47:17 -0400
Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Glenn McGrath wrote:
> > Current build process goes roughly as follows, there is a manually
edited
> > config file (Config.h, not to be confused with the autotools config.h)
that
>
> Since you're worried about portabili
Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> Hi, im trying to make a project im involved with
> (http://busybox.lineo.com/) more portable, specifically i want to make it
> compile under GNU/Hurd as well as linux.
>
> My initial thoughts were that autotools would be ideal, but busybox is an
> unusal project and im u
