Title: Remove
I noticed your email address on a list serve related to engineering and technology.
With your permission, we would like to send you information regarding new real-time
collaboration and utilities based on your interests. Please click the following
link and opt-in to our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
Hi there,
I have switched to the latest autoconf snapshot (2.52e, cvs-updated today)
and have tried hard to follow all the instructions for the upgrade.
I believe I am no longer using any
Charlotte == Charlotte Pettis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charlotte List, I have tried to configure autoconf for the Unix
Charlotte subsystem Interix with no luck. Is there anyone who uses
Charlotte OpenNt by SoftwaySystems and actually configured autoconf
Charlotte correctly? Any advice would
Chris == Chris Seawood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Hi, I'm the build maintainer for Mozilla.
Hi!
Chris This is partially understandable as we do some bad things like
Chris calling AC_OUTPUT_SUBDIRS manually so that we can add options
Chris to subconfigures.
Yeah, that's bad. The real
Did you realize that you can earn your legimate BA, MA or PhD degree using the your
existing work experience and/or your academic experience?
If you are a high school graduate with a minimum of 4 years work experience in a
particular field, YOU CAN QUALIFY.
FOR MORE INFORMATION SEND US A
Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary But then, I wonder why you bother to `smash' anyway?
Because I frequently read configure, and I like to have it readable.
My Autoconf programming style is also based on the hypothetic idea
that some day M4 could be able to expand
Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary As far as shell functions are concerned, it seems to me that
Gary m4sh could provide shell function wrapper macros which expand to
Gary a function/function call if that is supported by the shell, or
Gary else an inline function if not...
How about going for a release? Is there any *new* problem since 2.52?
Is there anything we should put into CVS before moving to a beta,
then, hopefully, a release?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:52PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary But then, I wonder why you bother to `smash' anyway?
Because I frequently read configure, and I like to have it readable.
My Autoconf programming style is also based on
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 06:00:38PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
Gary == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary As far as shell functions are concerned, it seems to me that
Gary m4sh could provide shell function wrapper macros which expand to
Gary a function/function call if that is
From: Akim Demaille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 19 Oct 2001 18:50:14 +0200
How about going for a release? Is there any *new* problem since 2.52?
I suspect there will be some problems due to all the changes/bugfixes
introduced since 2.52. I'm worried about the LINENO / exec-bash
stuff, for
Hi,
I maintain the ORBit packages for the Debian project. (ORBit is the
CORBA component of GNOME). And I have a feature request for
autoconf. I'm not an autoconf guru, so please bear with me.
Basically, ORBit contains a library for parsing IDL (Interface
Definition Language) files. These
Tim == Tim Van Holder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it is probably still worth mentioning in the autoconf manual's
section on portable shell programming.
Yes, that makes sense.
Tim I'll whip up something tomorrow.
Hi Tim! ;)
13 matches
Mail list logo
