Hello,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:57:11PM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Paul Eggert wrote:
Autoconf generates a script that attempts to compile with -Ae option
on HP-UX 10.20 and later. That sounds related. Perhaps HP-UX's -Ae
option is doing something that GCC also
Hi,
I've just got autoconf 2.57 and automake 1.7 to compile a gtk 2.2.2 program.
When i change configure.ac or Makefile.am, are you supposed to run autoreconf,
or just run the appropriate autoheader/aclocal/autoconf/automake separately?
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:57:11PM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Paul Eggert wrote:
Autoconf generates a script that attempts to compile with -Ae option
on HP-UX 10.20 and later. That sounds related. Perhaps
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apparently there is a bug in gcc-3.1 regarding -pipe; it causes configure
to just hang.
Is there a better way to detect the version of gcc in autoconf other than
parse the output of gcc --version so I can
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
$ autoreconf -vis
# ... from automake:
Makefile.am:3: required file `./strtod.c' not found
Maybe because you have referenced LIBOBJS in your top leve Makefile.am,
automake assumes it should look for them there?
I played with AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR and it doesn't seem to
Paul Eggert wrote:
* sAn * [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rpm -q autoconf
This sounds like a Red Hat issue, not an Autoconf issue. Autoconf is
distributed as source code; Red Hat takes that source code and turns
it into RPMs. So you'll need to ask Red Hat.
Source RPMs for autoconf 2.57
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:49:32PM -0500, Raja R Harinath wrote:
Try
m4_pattern_forbid([target][_alias],...)
to break up any literal grepping of the file. I don't know if it'll
work, but it's worth a try.
Good thought. I tried it, but unfortunately it doesn't change anything.
Any
Phil Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:44:12PM -0500, Raja R Harinath wrote:
That's strange. It is implemented by a grep.
foreach (split (/\W+/))
{
$prohibited{$_} = $.
if /$forbidden/o !/$allowed/o ! exists
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:07:29PM -0500, Raja R Harinath wrote:
That's probably because it's been rate-limited. Only one error per
forbidden word, it appears.
Ah. Okay, so I just need to put the m4_pattern_forbid() call at the end
of configure.in, so that all possible uses precede it.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:03:36PM -0500, Raja R Harinath wrote:
Phil Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where is this code? On my system, /usr/bin/m4 is a binary, not a perl
script. :-) I've been trying to dig to learn more, but haven't yet
retrieved the m4 source.
In
Phil Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:07:29PM -0500, Raja R Harinath wrote:
That's probably because it's been rate-limited. Only one error per
forbidden word, it appears.
Ah. Okay, so I just need to put the m4_pattern_forbid() call at the end
of configure.in,
11 matches
Mail list logo
