[Hubert Chan] Bug#332713: autoconf: checking for fork does not work for C++

2005-10-22 Thread Ben Pfaff
The following bug was reported against the Debian packaging of Autoconf 2.59. I verified that it produced the reported results on my system as well. [Preserving the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in replies would be kind, because that allows replies to be preserved in the Debian BTS.] [Hubert: sorry ab

Re: AC_FOREACH public?

2005-10-22 Thread Keith Marshall
On Saturday 22 October 2005 10:08 am, Allan Clark wrote: > You might want to consider switching to elm, mutt, or a Mozilla-based > client (if you're a graphical guy); they have these features, and are > fairly well-tested. I don't have any option to do this -- I am obliged by Company policy to use

Routing of Mail List Replies using the "Reply-to" Header

2005-10-22 Thread Keith Marshall
[In response to an aside comment, appearing in the "AC_FOREACH Public? thread] On Thursday 20 October 2005 1:31 pm, Stepan Kasal wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:48:20AM +0100, Keith MARSHALL wrote: > > Oops.  Forgot that GNU's list mailers don't set the Reply-to header > > properly, (can this

Re: AC_FOREACH public?

2005-10-22 Thread Allan Clark
Keith MARSHALL wrote: Oops. Forgot that GNU's list mailers don't set the Reply-to header properly, (can this not be fixed?), and only replied privately to Stepan. My mailer allows me to choose. I use "reply" when I want to make a private reply, and "reply-all" when I want to reply to the list