The following Makefile.am does not work as expected. This is a stripped
down version of the complete makefile. It still shows the same problem
as the complete file, which is more than twice as large.
The way it works, one of either BOOST1_33, BOOST1_31, or BOOST1_28 will
be defined. The am__ve
Keith Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But "Reply-to-All" is *not* the most appropriate solution --
> it's what I used here, so *you* can have *two* copies of this
> message.
Personally, I configure my mailreader to discard duplicates.
--
Ben Pfaff
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://ben
Keith Marshall wrote:
On Saturday 22 October 2005 10:08 am, Allan Clark wrote:
You might want to consider switching to elm, mutt, or a Mozilla-based
client (if you're a graphical guy); they have these features, and are
fairly well-tested.
I don't have any option to do this -- I am obli
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CVS autoconf does this instead. I presume the AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT
> fixes the same problem in a different way?
Yes, it does. I've applied the change to Debian's Autoconf
package. Thanks for your help.
--
"Then, I came to my senses, and slunk away, hop
CVS autoconf does this instead. I presume the AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT
fixes the same problem in a different way?
AC_DEFUN([_AC_FUNC_FORK],
[AC_CACHE_CHECK(for working fork, ac_cv_func_fork_works,
[AC_RUN_IFELSE(
[AC_LANG_PROGRAM([AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT],
[
/* By Ruediger Ku
