Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I noticed that cygwin.com has archives of the Autoconf mailing
> lists going back farther than the lists.gnu.org archives currently do:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/autoconf/
> http://cygwin.com/ml/bug-autoconf/
> http://cygwin.com/ml/autoconf-patches/
> http://cygwin.com
Hi Paolo,
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:59:53PM CEST:
>
> >after Autoconf-2.60...
> Then you will hate me for this patch, which I promised to send at
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2006-01/msg00110.html (yes,
> five months ago).
>
> It makes AC_COMPUTE_INT publ
after Autoconf-2.60...
Then you will hate me for this patch, which I promised to send at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2006-01/msg00110.html (yes,
five months ago).
It makes AC_COMPUTE_INT public.
Regtests in progress, tested already with `make info'.
Paolo
I noticed that cygwin.com has archives of the Autoconf mailing
lists going back farther than the lists.gnu.org archives currently do:
http://cygwin.com/ml/autoconf/
http://cygwin.com/ml/bug-autoconf/
http://cygwin.com/ml/autoconf-patches/
http://cygwin.com/ml/autoconf-cvs/
They are not lis