On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, NightStrike wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 12/15/2012 03:08 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Is the program designed to remove old core
files as part of the autoconf process?
No, new cores. 'configure' regularly generates
programs that dump co
On 12/16/2012 07:06 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Why not just use ulimit to not dump core? Or is that a bashism and not a shism?
The ulimit approach seems useful.
Yes, that would be nice to add, if someone writes
a patch. I doubt whether it'd work everywhere, though.
Instead they write a c
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> On 12/15/2012 05:54 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> FYI, a couple of weeks ago, Aki Helin exposed still more problems in
>>> gzip's unpacking code.
>>
>> Well, to be fair, I also have a similar problem with 'tar'
>> in my inb
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Paul Eggert wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2012 05:54 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
FYI, a couple of weeks ago, Aki Helin exposed still more problems in
gzip's unpacking code.
>>>
>>> Well, to be fair, I also have a similar
