It's what I've done for years. Does it get rid of the problem? I don't
think so but for legacy code that is no longer being maintained, either
you maintain it, or the problem exists into infinity with a hard stop
when someone does maintain it. I think the battle is trying to overcome
On Tuesday 21 May 2013 09:57:32 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 2013-05-21 07:33, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Works for me. But we [distros] do want to mandate autoreconf anyway in
the general case: it is the *only* way to keep upstream honest about
the much hated build system not bitrotting
On Monday 20 May 2013 10:37:00 Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/18/2013 05:45 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 16:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yes. It would have been really useful if autofoo used whatever is in
/usr/share/misc, unless there is a config.sub.override or
On Saturday 18 May 2013 07:45:54 Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 16:05 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yes. It would have been really useful if autofoo used whatever is in
/usr/share/misc, unless there is a config.sub.override or
config.guess.override file in the source
On 05/22/2013 10:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
I would MUCH rather see us honor a CONFIG_GUESS and CONFIG_SUB
environment variable, rather than baking in a PATH search. This topic
has come up in the past, where I made the same request back then.
this might be sufficient for distro packagers
On Wednesday 22 May 2013 12:27:38 Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/22/2013 10:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
I would MUCH rather see us honor a CONFIG_GUESS and CONFIG_SUB
environment variable, rather than baking in a PATH search. This topic
has come up in the past, where I made the same request back
(Not sure which list is relevant, so I'm cross-posting to both mingw-users
and autoconf lists)
Hello lists,
when I'm cross compiling from linux x86_64 to 32-bit MinGW autoconf
refuses to detect getaddrinfo and define HAVE_GETADDRINFO. I've limited
the case to the following behaviour:
The
Hello,
On 2013-05-22 20:22 +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
The getaddrinfo-link.c attached file is a simplification of what
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(getaddrinfo) tries to compile and link. It fails to find
the symbol because gcc most probably doesn't use proper calling
conventions (stdcall).
On Wed, 22 May 2013, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
(Not sure which list is relevant, so I'm cross-posting to both mingw-users
and autoconf lists)
Not a cross-post after all since mingw-users requires registration. I'd
appreciate any help from autoconf people, just make sure you don't CC
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com wrote:
The fundamental problem, I think, is that you really need the proper
headers included and AC_REPLACE_FUNCS does not seem to allow you to
specify the includes. So you probably can't use this macro at all.
You can use
On 05/22/2013 02:12 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Nick Bowler nbow...@elliptictech.com wrote:
The fundamental problem, I think, is that you really need the proper
headers included and AC_REPLACE_FUNCS does not seem to allow you to
specify the includes. So you
11 matches
Mail list logo
