On 3/2/23 19:30, Wookey wrote:
Gnulib automatically changing the ABI for packages that use it is
deeply unhelpful and is going to cause significant breakage and
hassle.
This change to Gnulib was reverted in December[1] and that propagated
into bleeding-edge GnuTLS last month[2]. So if I
On 3/2/23 02:38, Andreas Schwab wrote:
There is a huge difference between them: time_t has a flag day, off_t
doesn't.
Absolutely right.
Another thing that's different is that when off_t grew in the 1990s,
people said they needed a wider off_t RIGHT NOW, because programs
wouldn't work on
On 2023-03-02 13:24 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > Another way to look at this is that it's a bug in gnutls and we should
> > > fix it only in this package
> >
> > It's by far not just this one
On Mär 02 2023, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Fifteen years from now we'll be saying the same thing about
> _TIME_BITS. There will be some pain in the meantime, just as there was
> with the _FILE_OFFSET_BITS transition, something I lived through and was
> not too happy about either.
There is a huge
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Another way to look at this is that it's a bug in gnutls and we should
> > fix it only in this package
>
> It's by far not just this one package. An 'fgrep -rl time_t /usr/include'
> search shows a
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 07:29:01PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 3/1/23 17:38, Eric Blake wrote:
> > [replying to the original post, because I'm not sure where else in the
> > more recent activity on this thread would be more appropriate]
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 08:38:18AM +,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:28:28AM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2023-03-02 01:04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >IMHO if distros really want to deal with this, they need to be able to
> >force _TIME_BITS=64 globally / unconditionally, and do a mass rebuild.
>
> As things stand this is probably
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 04:38:59PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> [replying to the original post, because I'm not sure where else in the
> more recent activity on this thread would be more appropriate]
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 08:38:18AM +, Sam James wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In Gentoo,
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Another way to look at this is that it's a bug in gnutls and we should
> fix it only in this package
It's by far not just this one package. An 'fgrep -rl time_t /usr/include'
search shows a number of libraries that use time_t in their API:
alsa, boost, libstdc++,
On 2023-03-02 01:04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
IMHO if distros really want to deal with this, they need to be able to
force _TIME_BITS=64 globally / unconditionally, and do a mass rebuild.
As things stand this is probably the best way to go. Although some pain
is inevitable, this approach
10 matches
Mail list logo
