s the trick.
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-711-685-63607
<>___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
small obstacle on the path to get autoconf installed.
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-711-685-63607
<>___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailm
en if the
"bad" versions would be used?
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-711-685-63607
<>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Autoconf maili
The problem of detecting MS Windows with autoconf is much deeper than
not having a macro for it. You simply cannot run autoconf on MS Windows,
as it requires other tools that are not available on Windows, so there
is no macro to detect it.
Or are you talking of Cygwin?
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Le
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-711-685-63607
<>___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
hese than the old
A(C)X_MPI macro, as they are more reliable on unusual architectures.
I think that they will also solve your problem.
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-
from the one used for non-MPI files, as the compiler
options used by Automake will be generated for the non-MPI compiler and
might not work on the MPI-compiler. For example, on an IBM machine, this
would cause trouble:
configure CXX=g++ MPICXX=xlc_r
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für C
I precisely because of the issues with the macro.
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-711-685-63607
<>___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
#x27;t want to
compile *all* his code using the MPI compiler, but only some files.
However, I have no clear idea why someone would want to do that...
Does anybody here have an application for the old macros? If nobody has
an idea, then we can as well deprecate the macro.
Olaf
--
Dr. rer.
documentation
of the older macro AX_MPI from here:
https://github.com/olenz/autoconf-archive
For reference, I have attached the new macros as well as the modified
ax_mpi.m4 to this mailing.
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49-711
ap macro. I believe that it might be useful to
people that want to use libtool and build shared libraries. One might
consider the macro for inclusion to the autoconf macro archive.
Cheers
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut für Computerphysik, Pfaffenwaldring 27, D-70569 Stuttgart
Phone: +49
ly, the MPI macro uses the standard macro AC_PROG_CC to find the
compiler, and directly sets CC to a working MPI version.
I propose to include these macros into the autoconf macro archive, and
to extend the docs of AX_MPI to point to these macros.
Greetings
Olaf
--
Dr. rer. nat. Olaf Lenz
Institut
ernatives worked there.
> Extensible light-weight shells like 'rc' and 'es'
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Es_shell) can serve as an example.
No, they can't, because they are not installed on unusual platforms by
default.
Sorry to be so much against these suggestion
On 12/22/2010 06:40 PM, Carsten Heinrici wrote:
> If a project requires a specialized tool chain, I would consider it wrong to
> just silently fall back to something different as required.
Well, the point is that our project doesn't require MPI, but it profits
from it. If MPI is not available, y
Hi Ralf, Erik!
On 12/22/2010 07:44 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> One problem with the above is that the settings 'gcc' and 'cc' will fail
> to be correct MPI compilers, as they likely won't link in the MPI
> library. Nowadays this doesn't happen so often any more but on some
> systems it is good t
Hello again!
On 12/21/2010 03:16 PM, Olaf Lenz wrote:
> The problem seems to be that AC_PROG_CC doesn't work when using it in
> a conditional, is that right? Is there any simple way to do what I
> want?
After some trial and error I have found a solution for my problem that
is very
characteristics and only afterwards
finds the MPI compiler. If the MPI compiler understands completely
different options than the standard compiler, this leads to massive
problems.
Best regards
Olaf Lenz
References:
[1] http://espressomd.org
[2] http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-ar
dd a macro that allows to introduce the old behaviour!
Best regards, and keep up the good work,
Olaf Lenz
References:
[1] http://espressowiki.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
[2] http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_Passing_Interface
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I'm not an autoconf expert, so please excuse any novice errors.
I'm working on AIX with the C++ compiler xlC 6.
Because I have read the thread "Using AC_C_INLINE blows up C++ tests" in June,
I've already updated autoconf to version 2.57b, so the
19 matches
Mail list logo