Re: Conflict between standard headers and winsock(2).h

2018-08-21 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2016-01-22 12:33, Marko Lindqvist wrote: > When building a project on MSYS2 environment, my configure fails to > find out that the winsock2.h is available there. > Simple AC_CHECK_HEADER() for winsock2.h fails, and so would many > standard macros if it was to be included. The reason for that

Re: cl.exe and system types

2018-08-21 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2018-08-20 16:11, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > Dear all, > > I am writing an autoconf script for a project which is supposed to > compile under both Unix and Windows. > > Under Windows, the project will be built under Cygwin but it should be > possible to use both MingW and cl.exe to compile

Re: AC_CHECK_LIB Not finding Libraries that are not Compiled with PIC

2014-05-23 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2014-05-22 15:39, James L. Barker wrote: OS: RHEL 6.5 Autoconf: 2.63 Automake: 1.11.1 I have a library compiled as a mylib.a without Position Independent Code. When I put the following line in my configure.ac file, the library is not found. LDFLAGS=-I/usr/local/packages/lib

AC_PATH_PROGS_FEATURE_CHECK results in namespace invasion

2014-02-26 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! It's not possible to use AC_PATH_PROGS_FEATURE_CHECK with a cache variable that does not start with ac_cv_path_ which is bad since one project might check for a certain capability of tool foo, while some other project is interested in some completely orthogonal capability of that same tool

Re: AC_PATH_PROGS_FEATURE_CHECK results in namespace invasion

2014-02-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2014-02-27 01:20, Russ Allbery wrote: Peter Rosin writes: It's not possible to use AC_PATH_PROGS_FEATURE_CHECK with a cache variable that does not start with ac_cv_path_ which is bad since one project might check for a certain capability of tool foo, while some other project

Re: AC_PATH_PROGS_FEATURE_CHECK results in namespace invasion

2014-02-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2014-02-27 01:38, Russ Allbery wrote: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se writes: On 2014-02-27 01:20, Russ Allbery wrote: Wouldn't you name the variable FOO_FEATURE? In other words, I think the example in the Autoconf manual is not the best, but the functionality you need is there. I

Re: AC_PATH_PROGS_FEATURE_CHECK results in namespace invasion

2014-02-26 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2014-02-27 02:00, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2014-02-27 01:38, Russ Allbery wrote: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se writes: On 2014-02-27 01:20, Russ Allbery wrote: Wouldn't you name the variable FOO_FEATURE? In other words, I think the example in the Autoconf manual is not the best

Re: gnu linker/--no-as-needed?

2014-01-08 Thread Peter Rosin
[Technically this is a Libtool question, but I'll answer here anyway] On 2014-01-08 07:58, Harlan Stenn wrote: I need configure to tell me if I can use --no-as-needed or --as-needed. Right now we have been only using these flags if we're using GCC, and I've got a case (solaris) where gcc is

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Modernize header checks

2013-06-01 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-05-31 23:46, Eric Blake wrote: On 05/31/2013 03:26 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: On 2013-05-31 19:19, Eric Blake wrote: That said, would it hurt if autoconf just unconditionally defined the macros that were previously conditionally defined by a probe, so that code that was relying

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Modernize header checks

2013-05-31 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-05-31 19:19, Eric Blake wrote: That said, would it hurt if autoconf just unconditionally defined the macros that were previously conditionally defined by a probe, so that code that was relying on HAVE_STRINGS_H instead of blind inclusion will still compile? How would one do to be

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Modernize header checks

2013-05-31 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-06-01 00:06, Russ Allbery wrote: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se writes: On 2013-05-31 19:19, Eric Blake wrote: That said, would it hurt if autoconf just unconditionally defined the macros that were previously conditionally defined by a probe, so that code that was relying

Re: Cross-platform availability of header files

2013-03-15 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-03-15 05:05, Russ Allbery wrote: Zack Weinberg za...@panix.com writes: I think we should try to come up with a principled cutoff for how old is too old, though. I started this thinking POSIX.1-2001 (including XSI, but maybe not any other options) was a reasonable place to draw the

Re: Cross-platform availability of header files

2013-03-15 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-03-15 21:18, Zack Weinberg wrote: On 2013-03-15 9:14 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: I just wanted to chime in with the fact that it's working just fine to use one of said UNIX-like portability environments and have Autoconf probe MSVC directly. This is relevant to my interests ;) How do

Re: [FYI] m4sugar: fix AS_VAR_GET regression.

2013-01-29 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-01-29 13:27, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: AS_VAR_GET expands AS_ECHO inside en evaled single quoted string, which causes the single quotes in printf '%s\n' to expose the %s\n to the shell which expands \n to simply n before passing it to printf. * lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4 (AS_ECHO): Use double

Re: [FYI] m4sugar: fix AS_VAR_GET regression.

2013-01-29 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-01-29 14:31, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi Peter, On 29 Jan 2013, at 20:17, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: On 2013-01-29 13:27, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Normally, @command{printf} is safer and easier to use than @command{echo} -and @command{echo -n}. Thus, you should use

Re: [PATCHv2] m4sugar: factor away _AS_ECHO_PREPARE.

2013-01-28 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2013-01-29 03:24, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: * doc/autoconf.text (Limitations of Shell Builtins): Document s/text/texi/ Cheers, Peter

Re: [PATCH 3/3] syntax-check: remove SPACE-TAB sequence

2012-11-16 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-11-16 11:37, Stefano Lattarini wrote: * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (_AC_PROG_CC_C99): Here. Was causing a failure in the 'space_tab' syntax check. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini stefano.lattar...@gmail.com --- lib/autoconf/c.m4 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Re: bug: gcc -std=gnu99 passes AC_PROG_CC_C11

2012-10-02 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-10-02 16:02, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:40:31PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: On 10/01/2012 03:20 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: Not if they are set to default to C99 mode. Ah. True. That may be a problem for future versions of these two compilers, though it's not a problem

Re: Add more check in autoreconf

2012-08-16 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-08-16 22:17, Eric Blake wrote: On 08/16/2012 02:04 PM, Javier Jardón wrote: Hello, Im working on port GNOME moduels to use autoreconf instead our own tool, gnome-autogen [1] (they do almost the same, but gnome-autogen was created before autoreconf exist) A bit of research shows

Re: [PATCH] remove warning for --host without --build

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-04-22 19:42, Bruno Haible wrote: Hi, On bi-arch systems (such as x86 / x86_64) it is often necessary to pass the --host option together with an appropriate value for CC. But this triggers a warning: $ ./configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu CC=gcc -m32 -march=i586 configure:

Re: [PATCH] remove warning for --host without --build

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-04-23 11:14, Bruno Haible wrote: Peter Rosin wrote: If you don't specify --build when you are cross-compiling (i.e. host != build), in an environment where the build system -- for one reason or another -- is able to execute the host code, the heuristic to detect a cross-compiler

Re: [PATCH] remove warning for --host without --build

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-04-23 13:16, Bruno Haible wrote: Peter Rosin wrote: $ uname -mo i686 Cygwin $ cat EOF configure.ac AC_INIT([cross-test], [0.1]) AC_PROG_CC AC_OUTPUT EOF $ autoconf $ ./configure --host=i686-pc-mingw32 ... checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler

Re: [PATCH] remove warning for --host without --build

2012-04-23 Thread Peter Rosin
On 2012-04-23 19:32, Paul Eggert wrote: On 04/23/2012 04:16 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: 2012-04-23 Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org doc: Mention an effect of --build on AC_RUN_IFELSE. * doc/autoconf.texi (Specifying Target Triplets): Mention another effect of --build. Thanks, I

Re: [FYI] {master} maint: assume 'test -x' is portable

2012-02-27 Thread Peter Rosin
Eric Blake skrev 2012-02-27 14:58: On 02/26/2012 03:14 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: Sorry for the late reply, but this might be relevant. Personally, I wouldn't classify the below as a working test -x, but I'm not sure what working is in this context... Thanks for chiming in. I still

Re: [FYI] {master} maint: assume 'test -x' is portable

2012-02-26 Thread Peter Rosin
Eric Blake skrev 2012-02-23 23:42: On 02/23/2012 02:48 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: * lib/Makefile.am (installcheck-local): To verify that the installed scripts are actually executable, simply use 'test -x', instead of resorting to perl and its '-x' file operator. Today, 'test -x' should

Re: bug#10766: CXX gets the value 'CC' on Cygwin, but CC is in fact cc

2012-02-08 Thread Peter Rosin
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-02-08 22:31: Reference: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10766 [CC:ing the bug-autoconf list] On 02/08/2012 10:04 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: Hi! The testsuite on master tries to use lesser compilers, but on Cygwin this causes some failures due

Re: detecting windows

2012-02-03 Thread Peter Rosin
Werner LEMBERG skrev 2012-02-03 10:45: is there an autoconf macro to detect MS Windows? Is that a joke? The trouble is, that autoconf requires a shell and M4, which Windows doesn't provide (only in Cygwin). So MS Windows is detected when autoconf/configure does not run... Very witty :-)

Re: Dealing with compilers that pretend to be GCC

2012-01-20 Thread Peter Rosin
Dave Korn skrev 2012-01-20 01:15: *snip* That could be tricky because I guess you won't be able to use libtool at configure time. *snip* It's possible to use libtool at configure time, but you need to invoke LT_OUTPUT before you do so. Or is there a reason for that not to work in

Re: [PATCH] Fix LEXLIB and YYTEXT_POINTER on non-ANSI systems.

2012-01-04 Thread Peter Rosin
Paul Eggert skrev 2012-01-04 09:33: On 01/04/12 00:01, Peter Rosin wrote: Below is a patch that makes the lex library detection and the yytext-pointer tests not stumble when the system does not provide a unistd.h include. Are the tests really stumbling in that case? Yes. I don't have logs

[PATCH] Fix LEXLIB and YYTEXT_POINTER on non-ANSI systems.

2011-12-21 Thread Peter Rosin
@@ +2011-12-21 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se + + Fix LEXLIB and YYTEXT_POINTER on non-ANSI systems. + * lib/autoconf/programs.m4 (_AC_PROG_LEX_YYTEXT_DECL): + Don't require unistd.h to be present, which it isn't + with, e.g., MSVC. + 2011-12-07 Paul Eggert egg

Re: uint64_t fails with C++

2011-12-07 Thread Peter Rosin
Werner LEMBERG skrev 2011-12-07 21:08: I still don't understand the details of the autoconf problem (and I still think that something is fishy), but defining this macro works just fine :-) Clearly, depending on an implementation-dependent macro is not suitable for portable software. So

Re: How to enable/disable my debug code?

2011-08-01 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-07-31 01:57 skrev NightStrike: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Gary V. Vaughan g...@gnu.org wrote: On 31 Jul 2011, at 02:04, NightStrike wrote: *snip* Consider, though, using cl.exe in an msys environment. That uses / instead of - for switches, for instance. I would be quite

Re: Paralizing configure

2011-02-09 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-02-09 05:42 skrev Miles Bader: On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: At the least, constructs like AC_CHECK_HEADERS([stdint.h unistd.h fcntl.h sys/mman.h sys/stat.h]) could check all the entries in parallel. Only simple scenarios, in which headers

Re: Paralizing configure

2011-02-09 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-02-09 10:55 skrev Miles Bader: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se writes: [I meant, all the entries _within a single invocation_ (of AC_CHECK_HEADERS, etc) could be checked in parallel...] Yes, in a perfect world. If you e.g. do this: AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ \ ... So it would have

Re: configure -C by default?

2011-02-07 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-02-07 09:14 skrev Ralf Corsepius: Provided how HW has developed since the discussions from 10 years ago, you cited about, I am actually leaning towards proposing the converse of your proposal: Autoconf toconsider to abandoning config.cache. No, it still needs to be optional. Not

Re: configure -C by default?

2011-02-07 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-02-07 11:12 skrev Ralf Corsepius: On 02/07/2011 10:02 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: Den 2011-02-07 09:14 skrev Ralf Corsepius: Provided how HW has developed since the discussions from 10 years ago, you cited about, I am actually leaning towards proposing the converse of your proposal

Re: Overriding LN_S

2011-01-10 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-10-21 12:02 skrev Paolo Bonzini: On 10/18/2010 10:07 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: So, your patch needs more work, either in autoconf.texi (documenting that LN_S needs to be set in the environment rather than on the configure command line) or we need to think or some other way to fixup

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-11-18 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-18 22:17 skrev Paul Eggert: On 11/17/10 21:47, Peter Rosin wrote: If you take some random proprietary compiler on some random proprietary unix, you expect autotools to cope. No, actually, I don't expect that. For example, on Solaris 10, I must pass some arguments to 'configure

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-11-17 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-17 06:35 skrev Paul Eggert: On 11/16/2010 01:49 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: We have a proposed patch that fixes problems. If this is talking about the patch proposed in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2010-08/msg00023.html Yes, that's the patch, sorry

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-11-17 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-17 09:57 skrev Paul Eggert: On 11/17/2010 12:16 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: just the other day I built a couple of libraries with MSVC with simple autoreconf -i; configure CC=cl CFLAGS=-nologo [more stuff]; make sequences. The autoreconf step will not be needed once the libraries

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-11-16 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-16 21:26 skrev Peter Rosin: Den 2010-08-16 20:45 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:14:50PM CEST: The logo of my version of MSVC is: 8 Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86

Re: best way to check for compiler _warnings_?

2010-11-03 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-02 20:15 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hello Peter, Miles, * Miles Bader wrote on Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:18:24AM CET: On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: Den 2010-11-02 06:46 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Except then you may run into MSVC which prints its command-line options

Re: best way to check for compiler _warnings_?

2010-11-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-02 06:46 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Except then you may run into MSVC which prints its command-line options (dunno whether on stdout or stderr) ... To expand on that tangent... MSVC only prints the options it ends up feeding to link.exe (or maybe it's link.exe that prints them?) and

Re: best way to check for compiler _warnings_?

2010-11-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-11-02 08:18 skrev Miles Bader: On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: Den 2010-11-02 06:46 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Except then you may run into MSVC which prints its command-line options (dunno whether on stdout or stderr) ... To expand on that tangent

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-10-18 Thread Peter Rosin
expansion and AC_PROG_LN_S, at least as long as _AS_LN_S_PREPARE is expanded first but that seems pretty hard to change). Cheers, Peter 2010-10-18 Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se AC_PROG_LN_S: allow overriding of as_ln_s with LN_S. * lib/autoconf/programs.m4 (AC_PROG_LN_S): If LN_S

Re: Testing for GCC-like attributes and compiler switches

2010-10-16 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-10-16 10:39 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hello Václav, * Václav Haisman wrote on Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 08:56:51PM CEST: I am having difficulty testing for compiler features like __declspec(dllimport) and switches like -Wall or -Werror. The problem has started like this. I wanted to test

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-10-15 Thread Peter Rosin
$$.dir/conf$$.file conf$$.file rmdir conf$$.dir 2/dev/null +else + as_ln_s=$LN_S +endif ])# _AS_LN_S_PREPARE From 2d11f3141128aa2dec277119b273e455620e280b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:18:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] AS_LN_S: allow overriding

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-10-15 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-10-15 19:51 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:28:53AM CEST: I haven't actually tested the patch, but it seems trivial enough. Bzzt. You are just barely saved yourself by admitting it upfront! ;- Oooops. --- a/lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-10-15 Thread Peter Rosin
$$.dir/conf$$.file conf$$.file rmdir conf$$.dir 2/dev/null +else + as_ln_s=$LN_S +endif ])# _AS_LN_S_PREPARE From 2d11f3141128aa2dec277119b273e455620e280b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:18:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] AS_LN_S: allow overriding

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi Steffen! Den 2010-09-02 21:50 skrev Steffen Dettmer: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: (background: I want to have Libtool on Cygwin drive MSVC, and Cygwin creates soft links that MSVC does not understand. The Libtool testsuite invokes autoconf followed

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-09-03 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-03 11:47 skrev Steffen Dettmer: On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: Den 2010-09-02 21:50 skrev Steffen Dettmer: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se wrote: [cp instead of ln -s] couldn't this break dependcies? I'm

Overriding LN_S

2010-09-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! For various reasons I want to override the decision autoconf makes regarding LN_S. It it set to ln -s on my system which is perfectly fine in every normal case. But in my abnormal case I want it to be cp -p. What can I do? I also want this to propagate to recursive autoconf invocations, so it

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-09-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-02 21:32 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:18:29PM CEST: For various reasons I want to override the decision autoconf makes regarding LN_S. It it set to ln -s on my system which is perfectly fine in every normal case. But in my

Re: Overriding LN_S

2010-09-02 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-02 21:45 skrev Peter Rosin: Den 2010-09-02 21:32 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:18:29PM CEST: For various reasons I want to override the decision autoconf makes regarding LN_S. It it set to ln -s on my system which is perfectly

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-18 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-17 22:01 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:41:06PM CEST: Den 2010-08-16 21:36 skrev Eric Blake: Rather than doing a sed for a particular regex, I would be much more comfortable with a comparison of the two outputs. Less chance of Microsoft

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-18 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-18 13:35 skrev Paolo Bonzini: On 08/16/2010 08:14 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: The logo of my version of MSVC is: 8 Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. 8 Which

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-18 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-18 15:53 skrev Peter Rosin: Den 2010-08-18 13:35 skrev Paolo Bonzini: On 08/16/2010 08:14 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: The logo of my version of MSVC is: 8 Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-17 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-16 21:41 skrev Peter Rosin: Den 2010-08-16 21:36 skrev Eric Blake: On 08/16/2010 01:26 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: Good catch, I knew they were very similar and assumed my matching was just about wide enough. But since I didn't check, Murphy made sure that it wasn't working

[PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-16 Thread Peter Rosin
2001 From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:48:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr. * lib/autoconf/general.m4 (_AC_RUN_LOG_STDERR): Unless you pass the -NOLOGO option to MSVC, it will always output a boilerplate logo on stderr. This foils

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-16 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-16 20:45 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:14:50PM CEST: The logo of my version of MSVC is: 8 Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-16 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-16 21:36 skrev Eric Blake: On 08/16/2010 01:26 PM, Peter Rosin wrote: Good catch, I knew they were very similar and assumed my matching was just about wide enough. But since I didn't check, Murphy made sure that it wasn't working for everybody, see below... Rather than doing

Re: [PATCH] Ignore boilerplate logo from MSVC on stderr.

2010-08-16 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-16 21:41 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:26:57PM CEST: Den 2010-08-16 20:45 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: * Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:14:50PM CEST: The logo of my version of MSVC is: Without having looked at the patch or your

[PATCH] Keep testsuite files on unexpected pass.

2010-08-10 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! I have now gotten sufficiently annoyed about the libtool testsuite not keeping files around for me when a test unexpectedly passes. So, this fixes that. Cheers, Peter From 42cc8c42e44c45d4382b253c82b29d87550f827a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Rosin p...@lysator.liu.se Date: Tue, 10

Re: [PATCH] Keep testsuite files on unexpected pass.

2010-08-10 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-08-10 19:07 skrev Eric Blake: On 08/10/2010 03:48 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: Hi! I have now gotten sufficiently annoyed about the libtool testsuite not keeping files around for me when a test unexpectedly passes. So, this fixes that. I like it. Is there any chance you can modify