Le mardi 01 décembre 2009 à 19:25 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues a écrit :
> Hello Yann,
>
> * Yann Droneaud wrote on Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:09:11PM CET:
> > If AC_PROG_CC_C99 successfully found a C99 compliant C compiler,
> > AC_C_INLINE and AC_C_RESTRICT should use this result.
[Moving the discussion to autoconf@gnu.org]
Hi,
I've recently sent two patches against config.sub to
config-patc...@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/config-patches/2013-02/msg0.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/config-patches/2013-02/msg1.html
Yann Dronea
rg
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/config-patches/2013-02/msg2.html
let's try with the following patches on config.sub:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/config-patches/2013-02/msg0.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/config-patches/2013-02/msg1.html
Yann Droneaud (2):
Hi,
Le mardi 05 février 2013 à 19:15 +0100, Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
> On Sunday 2013-02-03 10:49, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> >
> >So to create a "valid" --build argument, I was going to use
> >--build=`uname -p`-`uname -s` but its producing 'x86_64-Linux'