Re: [Hubert Chan] Bug#332713: autoconf: checking for fork does not work for C++

2005-10-23 Thread Ben Pfaff
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > CVS autoconf does this instead. I presume the AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT > fixes the same problem in a different way? Yes, it does. I've applied the change to Debian's Autoconf package. Thanks for your help. -- "Then, I came to my senses, and slunk away, hop

Re: [Hubert Chan] Bug#332713: autoconf: checking for fork does not work for C++

2005-10-23 Thread Paul Eggert
CVS autoconf does this instead. I presume the AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT fixes the same problem in a different way? AC_DEFUN([_AC_FUNC_FORK], [AC_CACHE_CHECK(for working fork, ac_cv_func_fork_works, [AC_RUN_IFELSE( [AC_LANG_PROGRAM([AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT], [ /* By Ruediger Ku

[Hubert Chan] Bug#332713: autoconf: checking for fork does not work for C++

2005-10-22 Thread Ben Pfaff
The following bug was reported against the Debian packaging of Autoconf 2.59. I verified that it produced the reported results on my system as well. [Preserving the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in replies would be kind, because that allows replies to be preserved in the Debian BTS.] [Hubert: sorry ab