Hello, Akim!
| By the way, shouldn't we change the syntax of AC_LANG to
|
| AC_LANG(C, COMPILERS, ACTION-IF-FOUND, ACTION-IF-NOT-FOUND)
|
| and go ahead if no C compiler has been found but ACTION-IF-NOT-FOUND is
| given?
What advantage would that bring? How do you deal with the
Hello, Ralf!
checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E
checking for sh-rtems-gcc... sh-rtems-gcc
It's a separate problem that needs to be addressed before 2.50.
AC_PROG_CPP should require AC_PROG_CC.
Maybe we should go as far as to make both AC_PROG_CPP and AC_PROG_CC
obsolete in favor
Thanks for the report, it's a known bug. In fact this bug is not new,
what is new is that the core machinery now correctly catches it.
The problem is related to the fact that AC_PROG_CC can be expanded
twice, and since the first expansion expands AC_PROG_CPP, the second
expansion of AC_PROG_CC
