>configure:
>checking for hhc... (cached) yes
>make:
>cd tdg/en/html && hhc index.hhp
>/bin/sh: line 1: hhc: command not found
I think there is no problem with 'alias'.
The problem is "(cached)".
"cache files" mechanism is unreliable.
I don't understand why/when/how cache test operates.
But it s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make:
cd tdg/en/html && hhc index.hhp
/bin/sh: line 1: hhc: command not found
Why does AC_CHECK_PROG find hhc ?
Isn't "Why doesn't 'make' find 'hhc'?" a better question?
of course it's a good question.
But a goal of autoco
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > make:
> > cd tdg/en/html && hhc index.hhp
> > /bin/sh: line 1: hhc: command not found
> >
> > Why does AC_CHECK_PROG find hhc ?
>
> Isn't "Why doesn't 'make' find 'hhc'?" a better question?
>
of course it's a good question.
But a goal of autoconf is to prevent 'ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> make:
> cd tdg/en/html && hhc index.hhp
> /bin/sh: line 1: hhc: command not found
>
> Why does AC_CHECK_PROG find hhc ?
Isn't "Why doesn't 'make' find 'hhc'?" a better question?
___
Autoconf mailing list
Autoconf@gnu.org
h
There is a conflict with make behavior and AC_CHECK_PROG macro behavior
(maybe) when prog. is aliased (OS: cygwin) :
for example:
$ type -a hhc
hhc is aliased to `/cygdrive/c/Util/Dev/htmlhelp/hhc.exe'
configure.ac:
AC_CHECK_PROG([FOUND],[hhc],[yes],[no])
if test "x$FOUND" = "xno"; then
A