Hi!
On 06/15/2011 10:48 PM, Rhys Ulerich wrote:
>> Does anybody here have an application for the old macros?
>
> I do have such a use case.
>
> I build an MPI-based application along with some non-MPI,
> application-related utilities. The two build types are kept in
> separate subdirectories
Hi Christian!
On 06/15/2011 10:44 PM, Christian Rössel wrote:
>> In principle, the macro is still useful if somebody doesn't want to
>> compile *all* his code using the MPI compiler, but only some files.
>> However, I have no clear idea why someone would want to do that...
>
> We are doing exactl
(Unsure to which list this thread response should be sent due to an
earlier missing cross-post...)
On 06/15/2011 12:20 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
>> Now, I wonder what to do about AX_MPI. It seems to me like your
>> macros make that older version obsolete. Do you think we should
>> deprecate AX_MPI a
Am 15.06.2011 20:15, schrieb Olaf Lenz:
Hi!
On 06/15/2011 12:20 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
Now, I wonder what to do about AX_MPI. It seems to me like your
macros make that older version obsolete. Do you think we should
deprecate AX_MPI and delete it, eventually?
In principle, the macro is still
Hi!
On 06/15/2011 12:20 PM, Peter Simons wrote:
> Now, I wonder what to do about AX_MPI. It seems to me like your
> macros make that older version obsolete. Do you think we should
> deprecate AX_MPI and delete it, eventually?
In principle, the macro is still useful if somebody doesn't want to
c
Hi Olaf,
thank you very much for your efforts. I pushed the macros
AX_PROG_{CC,FC,F77,CXX}_MPI that were attached to your e-mail
to the Autoconf Archive in this commit:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf-archive.git/commit/?id=0f83111d8fd1f2be6603780f4da0114711ee51b6
I made a few cosme
Hi all again!
After the discussion on the mailing list and the subsequent
modifications I did to the AX_PROG_{CC,FC,F77,CXX}_MPI macros, I want to
suggest that these new macros should be included into the autoconf macro
archive.
You can pull the new macros and the modifications to the documentati
gt; To: autoconf@gnu.org; autoconf-archive-maintain...@gnu.org; Steven G.
>
>> Johnson; Julian C. Cummings
>
>> Subject: Autoconf MPI macros
>
>>
>
>> Hi all!
>
>>
>
>> We are using the GNU autotools and MPI in a number of our projects, and
> -Original Message-
> From: Olaf Lenz [mailto:ol...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 1:15 AM
> To: Daily, Jeff A
> Cc: autoconf@gnu.org; autoconf-archive-maintain...@gnu.org; Steven G.
> Johnson; Julian C. Cummings
> Subject: Re: Autoconf MPI ma
Hi!
On 05/24/2011 06:16 PM, Daily, Jeff A wrote:
> There are additional shortcomings that we noticed while trying to
> use MPI compilers with autotools. Specifically to autoconf, on some
> systems the MPI compilers produce incorrect results for the
> AC_F77_LIBRARY_LDFLAGS test.
The GA_F77_LIB
Johnson; Julian C. Cummings
> Subject: Autoconf MPI macros
>
> Hi all!
>
> We are using the GNU autotools and MPI in a number of our projects, and
> we found that the AX_MPI macro from the autoconf macro archive has a few
> shortcomings.
>
> The problem is tha
Hi all!
We are using the GNU autotools and MPI in a number of our projects, and
we found that the AX_MPI macro from the autoconf macro archive has a few
shortcomings.
The problem is that AX_MPI starts to do anything only after the standard
C compiler has been found via AC_PROG_CC. If you want to
12 matches
Mail list logo
