Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Paul Eggert
> From: Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 20 Jun 2001 18:47:38 +0200 > > BTW, the LFS configuration stuff is by Paul Eggert and he told me that > it is just a temporary solution until the stuff comes with a new > autoconf version. It's in autoconf 2.50. Once you switch to autoconf 2.50, y

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Werner" == Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Werner> BTW, the LFS configuration stuff is by Paul Eggert and he told Werner> me that it is just a temporary solution until the stuff comes Werner> with a new autoconf version. That's what I said: it's part of 2.50 now.

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
-- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2001 17:34 Uhr +0200 regarding Re: Config.status on OS X: > | > | AC_DEFUN(AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, > > The name is unquoted, and since 2.50 provide AC_SSY_LARGEFILE, the > name gets expanded.

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Werner Koch
|| On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:09:01 +0200 || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sh> No need to become self-righteous. It's not a Mac OS X problem, it's a sh> zsh problem. Of course you can claim that only bash or the original sh sh> are 'worthy' if that makes you happy. The shell is

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Werner Koch
|| On 20 Jun 2001 17:35:54 +0200 || Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ad> Heck, should I say again? It is *done*. That's fine. My point is that I can't take care fixing things in the responsibility of autoconf (or gettext) because that takes too much time. I did this quite a while

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
-- Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2001 16:18 Uhr +0200 regarding Re: Config.status on OS X: > || On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:04:47 +0200 > || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sh> So, would you be willing

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Lassi A. Tuura
> AC_DEFUN(AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, My guess: this should read `AC_DEFUN([AC_SYS_LARGEFILE],...'. You are now getting the expansion (from AC_SYS_LARGEFILE defined in autoconf itself) right there in the first argument of AC_DEFUN -- not what you want. Akim and other autoconf gurus can probably confirm

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Werner Koch
|| On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:04:47 +0200 || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sh> So, would you be willing to include a 'unset CDPATH' to gnupg's sh> configure.in? No. If this is really required Akim can do that in autoconf. I won't change things just because a GNU-like OS newco

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-20 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On Tuesday, June 19, 2001 20:08:16 +0200 Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > || On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:52:06 +0200 > || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sh> takes minutes between tests), but it is successful. Then, when I try > sh> to run autoconf 2.50 with the configu

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-19 Thread Lars Hecking
[Please take me out of the loop on replies. I'm reading both lists :)] Werner Koch writes: > || On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:52:06 +0200 > || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sh> takes minutes between tests), but it is successful. Then, when I try > sh> to run autoconf 2.50 wit

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-19 Thread Akim Demaille
| Hmm, there's a chance that I don't have a clue what I'm doing, but | this is what happens: the test suite executes incredibly slowly (it | takes minutes between tests), but it is successful. zsh 3's memory allocation was guilty, but anyway autoconf is _very_ slow. | Then, when I try | to run

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-19 Thread Werner Koch
|| On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:52:06 +0200 || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sh> takes minutes between tests), but it is successful. Then, when I try sh> to run autoconf 2.50 with the configure.in from gnupg-1.0.5 I get this Autoconf 2.13 and 2.50 are not compatible. You can't ju

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-19 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
-- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on Montag, 18. Juni 2001 20:27 Uhr +0200 regarding Re: Config.status on OS X: >>>>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>> writes: > > Sebast

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-18 Thread Akim Demaille
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sebastian> Regarding autoconf: OS X comes with version 2.13. From what Sebastian> I've read version 2.50 wouldn't have made a difference in Sebastian> this situation... I believe it does though. Could you check? Running the tes

Re: Config.status on OS X

2001-06-16 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
OK, from what we've learned I draw the following conclusions: - the issue has got nothing to do with Mac OS X in itself, only with the fact that Apple doesn't supply a 'sh' but instead a 'zsh' which sh is symlinked to - 'emulate sh' does not help - the line "CDPATH=" from configure may be ne