> From: Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 20 Jun 2001 18:47:38 +0200
>
> BTW, the LFS configuration stuff is by Paul Eggert and he told me that
> it is just a temporary solution until the stuff comes with a new
> autoconf version.
It's in autoconf 2.50. Once you switch to autoconf 2.50, y
> "Werner" == Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Werner> BTW, the LFS configuration stuff is by Paul Eggert and he told
Werner> me that it is just a temporary solution until the stuff comes
Werner> with a new autoconf version.
That's what I said: it's part of 2.50 now.
-- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on Mittwoch,
20. Juni 2001 17:34 Uhr +0200 regarding Re: Config.status on OS X:
> |
> | AC_DEFUN(AC_SYS_LARGEFILE,
>
> The name is unquoted, and since 2.50 provide AC_SSY_LARGEFILE, the
> name gets expanded.
|| On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:09:01 +0200
|| Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sh> No need to become self-righteous. It's not a Mac OS X problem, it's a
sh> zsh problem. Of course you can claim that only bash or the original sh
sh> are 'worthy' if that makes you happy.
The shell is
|| On 20 Jun 2001 17:35:54 +0200
|| Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ad> Heck, should I say again? It is *done*.
That's fine. My point is that I can't take care fixing things in the
responsibility of autoconf (or gettext) because that takes too much
time. I did this quite a while
-- Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on Mittwoch, 20.
Juni 2001 16:18 Uhr +0200 regarding Re: Config.status on OS X:
> || On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:04:47 +0200
> || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sh> So, would you be willing
> AC_DEFUN(AC_SYS_LARGEFILE,
My guess: this should read `AC_DEFUN([AC_SYS_LARGEFILE],...'. You are
now getting the expansion (from AC_SYS_LARGEFILE defined in autoconf
itself) right there in the first argument of AC_DEFUN -- not what you
want. Akim and other autoconf gurus can probably confirm
|| On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:04:47 +0200
|| Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sh> So, would you be willing to include a 'unset CDPATH' to gnupg's
sh> configure.in?
No. If this is really required Akim can do that in autoconf.
I won't change things just because a GNU-like OS newco
--On Tuesday, June 19, 2001 20:08:16 +0200 Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> || On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:52:06 +0200
> || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sh> takes minutes between tests), but it is successful. Then, when I try
> sh> to run autoconf 2.50 with the configu
[Please take me out of the loop on replies. I'm reading both lists :)]
Werner Koch writes:
> || On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:52:06 +0200
> || Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> sh> takes minutes between tests), but it is successful. Then, when I try
> sh> to run autoconf 2.50 wit
| Hmm, there's a chance that I don't have a clue what I'm doing, but
| this is what happens: the test suite executes incredibly slowly (it
| takes minutes between tests), but it is successful.
zsh 3's memory allocation was guilty, but anyway autoconf is _very_
slow.
| Then, when I try
| to run
|| On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:52:06 +0200
|| Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sh> takes minutes between tests), but it is successful. Then, when I try
sh> to run autoconf 2.50 with the configure.in from gnupg-1.0.5 I get this
Autoconf 2.13 and 2.50 are not compatible. You can't ju
-- Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on Montag, 18.
Juni 2001 20:27 Uhr +0200 regarding Re: Config.status on OS X:
>>>>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> writes:
>
> Sebast
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sebastian> Regarding autoconf: OS X comes with version 2.13. From what
Sebastian> I've read version 2.50 wouldn't have made a difference in
Sebastian> this situation...
I believe it does though. Could you check? Running the tes
OK,
from what we've learned I draw the following conclusions:
- the issue has got nothing to do with Mac OS X in itself, only with the
fact that Apple doesn't supply a 'sh' but instead a 'zsh' which sh is
symlinked to
- 'emulate sh' does not help
- the line "CDPATH=" from configure may be ne
15 matches
Mail list logo