RE: DOS pathnames

2001-02-13 Thread Tim Van Holder
Does it work at all? I just downloaded the most recent version and ran configure, and among other things it said:- [snip]

RE: DOS pathnames

2001-02-13 Thread Tim Van Holder
[Sorry - fingerslip caused a send] Does it work at all? I just downloaded the most recent version and ran configure, and among other things it said:- [snip] That's because 2.49c didn't have the pathsep deduction yet. The current CVS autoconf should find those apps.

Re: DOS pathnames

2001-02-12 Thread John Poltorak
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 04:35:08PM +0100, Tim Van Holder wrote: Does AUTOCONF provide support for DOS pathnames? ie drive letters, '\' in directories and ';' as separators in paths? It's starting to. The current CVS autoconf has had several patches applied for better DOS support. It's

DOS pathnames

2001-02-11 Thread John Poltorak
Does AUTOCONF provide support for DOS pathnames? ie drive letters, '\' in directories and ';' as separators in paths? -- John

RE: DOS pathnames

2001-02-11 Thread Tim Van Holder
Does AUTOCONF provide support for DOS pathnames? ie drive letters, '\' in directories and ';' as separators in paths? It's starting to. The current CVS autoconf has had several patches applied for better DOS support. It's not quite perfect yet, but a LOT better than stock 2.13. Tim Van