Ryan T. Sammartino wrote:
You will not find better material than this book to learn about the
GNU Build System.
I second that. I went from zero Autotools knowledge to a Zen master
with this book (well... almost :) ).
I'll third it. I procrastinated learning the autotools until I
I found this excellent website yesterday:-
http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/tutorials/autoconf/
Unfortunately it is out of date, and a number of links are broken.
Can anyone suggest an updated alternative?
--
John
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:32:55PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
I found this excellent website yesterday:-
http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/tutorials/autoconf/
Unfortunately it is out of date, and a number of links are broken.
Can anyone suggest an updated alternative?
Last link in
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:21:24PM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 12:32:55PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
I found this excellent website yesterday:-
http://www.amath.washington.edu/~lf/tutorials/autoconf/
Unfortunately it is out of date, and a number of links
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:49:28PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
Yes, it does look useful, but it would be better if it included Autoconf
v2.50.
I would definitely buy the book if it did.
I find your words quite rude!
You don't seem to realize the amount of effort that was put in this,
you
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/11/2001 12:49]:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:49:28PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
Yes, it does look useful, but it would be better if it included Autoconf
v2.50.
I would definitely buy the book if it did.
Let me emphasize it again.
You will
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 09:36:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:49:28PM +, John Poltorak wrote:
Yes, it does look useful, but it would be better if it included Autoconf
v2.50.
I would definitely buy the book if it did.
I find your words quite rude!
