Re: Possible patch for autoconf?

2001-04-25 Thread Akim Demaille
Daniel == Daniel Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Daniel The attached patch worked for me, though. Could you try this patch instead? I find the code somewhat hard to follow, and preferred to introduce IFELSE to make it more readable. I also submit this patch. Index: ChangeLog from Akim

Re: Possible patch for autoconf?

2001-04-23 Thread Daniel Carroll
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 03:15:08AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 20, 2001, Daniel Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a somewhat unusal C compiler and version of unix that is giving me problems with a configure script (using Autoconf 2.13). Try autoconf 2.49e, it's

Re: Possible patch for autoconf?

2001-04-22 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Apr 20, 2001, Daniel Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a somewhat unusal C compiler and version of unix that is giving me problems with a configure script (using Autoconf 2.13). Try autoconf 2.49e, it's supposed to work with compilers that print stuff when run. -- Alexandre

Possible patch for autoconf?

2001-04-20 Thread Daniel Carroll
Hello, I have a somewhat unusal C compiler and version of unix that is giving me problems with a configure script (using Autoconf 2.13). The result is that configure incorrectly decides that the limits.h header doesn't exist. There are two related reasons for this problem: a) The C