Rejecting dash because it lacks +=?

2008-10-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
I wanted to see if /bin/dash was really that much faster (*), and found several problems. Some of them I can send patches for; some are in libtool which should really ditch its poor-man echo replacement; one is worth discussing here. The problem is that /bin/dash did not pass the "suggested" test

Re: Rejecting dash because it lacks +=?

2008-10-30 Thread Eric Blake
Paolo Bonzini gnu.org> writes: > 2) The AS_VAR_APPEND technique, right now, does not give any speedup in > Autoconf-generated scripts, as far as I could read. It depends on how many appends are taking place. It matters more for coreutils than m4, for example, because coreutils generates a long

Re: Rejecting dash because it lacks +=?

2008-10-30 Thread Paolo Bonzini
> POSIX requires $LINENO (dash is buggy for not providing it). It is. > I'm committing this: Looks nice. Paolo ___ Autoconf mailing list Autoconf@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf