In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Berkley db changed prototypes for functions that are struct members.
how do I check for that?
The official word from Sleepycat is that it's much better to statically
link against a known version of BDB that you ship with your
* Mike Castle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-26 23:52:30 -0700]:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam Steingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Berkley db changed prototypes for functions that are struct members.
how do I check for that?
The official word from Sleepycat is that it's much better to
Hello,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:55:42AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 20:07 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
ad 1) Future versions will probably still have the funtion.
ad 2) Older versions don't have it.
ad 3) If another project provides the same functionality, your
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Well, instead of a conclusion I have to ask: is Berkeley db
functionality available only from one project, or are there several
implementations? (I think the db _format_ can be accessed by several
independent libraries, but that's not the question.)
On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 20:07 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:19:26PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
* David Boreham [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-14 08:42:46 -0700]:
Wouldn't it be easier to simply read the version number ?
...
isn't the whole idea of autoconf to
Berkley db changed prototypes for functions that are struct members.
how do I check for that?
here is what I have been able to come up with so far:
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether DB-stat() accepts TXNid],ac_cv_db_stat_accept_txn,[
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([#include db.h],
[[DB db;
Sam Steingold wrote:
Berkley db changed prototypes for functions that are struct members.
how do I check for that?
here is what I have been able to come up with so far:
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether DB-stat() accepts TXNid],ac_cv_db_stat_accept_txn,[
AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM([#include
It depends on what you're trying to check for. If all you're trying
to check is whether a particular form of call will work, then check
that form of call (as you have). If you want to check for the exact
signature, though, then I'd take the address of the function pointer
and assign it to a
