On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 03:17 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > But YOU can still disable it by default, by writing your packaging
> > automation tools to supply --disable-silent-rules as part of calling
> > ./configure, and/or writing an appropriate config.site. In other wor
On 10/14/2009 02:58 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Corsepius on 10/13/2009 9:20 AM:
What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
configure time or V=1 at make time?
Exactly this is the problem.
The problem isn&#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Ralf Corsepius on 10/13/2009 9:20 AM:
>>>> What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
>>>> configure time or V=1 at make time?
>>> Exactly this is the problem.
>>
>> T
h compiles without warning doesn't mean it is
being built correctly.)
What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
configure time or V=1 at make time?
Exactly this is the problem.
The problem isn't the support for silent rules. The problem is that
some package
is being built
correctly.)
What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
configure time or V=1 at make time?
Exactly this is the problem.
The problem isn't the support for silent rules. The problem is that
some packages are enabling it by default because it looks like
etc. for correctness
(NB: A package, which compiles without warning doesn't mean it is being
built correctly.)
What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
configure time or V=1 at make time?
Exactly this is the problem.
It means automake is pushing around pack
nuissance.)
Could you expand on this nuisance a bit more?
What work does it cause except for using --disable-silent-rules at
configure time or V=1 at make time? This is an honest question;
I'd like to avoid extra work for distributors.
Thanks,
Ralf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Alfred M. Szmidt on 5/24/2009 10:16 PM:
>- It would be good if the silent-rules API
> (--{disable,enable}-silent-rules, and V=0, V=1) were mentioned
> somewhere.
>
> Totally agree.
>
> I don'
- It would be good if the silent-rules API
(--{disable,enable}-silent-rules, and V=0, V=1) were mentioned
somewhere.
Totally agree.
I don't have the source code for autoconf here so no patch, but one
could mention setting V=0/V=1 in config.site if one wishes to
permanently fli
