Well, it seems there are no arguments against, and I only have a weak
argument for this patch...
Cheers,
Patrick
--- Begin Message ---
I haven't seen breakages without this patch, but it seems logical to me...
Thoughts?
Patrick
diff --git a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4 b/lib/autoconf/libs.m4
index cbc4218..8f7729b 100644
--- a/lib/autoconf/libs.m4
+++ b/lib/autoconf/libs.m4
@@ -236,21 +236,25 @@ m4_define([_AC_PATH_X_DIRECT],
# Check X11 before X11Rn because it is often a symlink to the current release.
ac_x_header_dirs='
/usr/X11/include
+/usr/X11R7/include
/usr/X11R6/include
/usr/X11R5/include
/usr/X11R4/include
/usr/include/X11
+/usr/include/X11R7
/usr/include/X11R6
/usr/include/X11R5
/usr/include/X11R4
/usr/local/X11/include
+/usr/local/X11R7/include
/usr/local/X11R6/include
/usr/local/X11R5/include
/usr/local/X11R4/include
/usr/local/include/X11
+/usr/local/include/X11R7
/usr/local/include/X11R6
/usr/local/include/X11R5
/usr/local/include/X11R4
_______________________________________________
Autoconf mailing list
autoc...@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf
--- End Message ---
