Thanks for getting the ball rolling on this. A couple of thoughts.
First, how does this compare to the warnings and manywarnings modules of
Gnulib? They seem to do something similar. See:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/warnings.html
http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/m
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:12:11 -0400, "Visser, Dale" wrote:
> Autoconf developers:
> The basic idea is to overall enhance the security of code built using
> autoconf, by turning on compiler warnings that the developers wouldn't
> otherwise think to.
I think this is *awesome*. I would really
Autoconf developers:
I originally posted the attached proposed changes back in January, and there
was some discussion of them then*. I did not push very hard about getting the
changes accepted then, because I was waiting on my employer's legal department
to sign off on the FSF copyright assignm
