[PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to

2012-08-23 Thread Paul Eggert
I pushed this. I did only C11, not C++11, since I'm not a C++ guru. * NEWS: * doc/autoconf.texi (C Compiler): Document this. (Gnulib, Function Portability, Particular Functions) (Header Portability, Particular Headers, Defining Symbols) (Printing Messages, Limitations of Usual Tools) (Preprocesso

Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to

2012-09-21 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert wrote: > I pushed this. I did only C11, not C++11, since I'm not a > C++ guru. > > * NEWS: > * doc/autoconf.texi (C Compiler): Document this. > (Gnulib, Function Portability, Particular Functions) > (Header Portability, Particular Headers, Defining Symbols) > (Printing Messages, Limita

Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to

2012-09-21 Thread Paul Eggert
On 09/21/2012 08:32 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > Here's what happens with diffutils: Hah! That's what I get for wading into this mess. But thanks for catching that; fix below. On 09/21/2012 01:18 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > Assuming that AC_PROG_CC_C99 deprecated and then removed, how I > suppos

Re: [PATCH] AC_PROG_CC_C11: new macro, which AC_PROG_CC_STDC now defaults to

2012-09-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert wrote: ... > Yes, on further thought I'm inclined to agree. Also, it's a lot > simpler. Also, it fixes Jim's bug. There's a lot to like. > Please see the patch below, which I've pushed. Further > comments welcome. > >>From f7fe375b26f39d0a6624ad9a6c532d9361a3226b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00