Default clean files

2000-11-13 Thread Derek R. Price
I'm in the middle of an attempt to convert CVS to use automake but I'm having some trouble. Is there some way to selectively override clean targets created by default for info targets without having to specify the entire clean target manually? I specified info_TEXINFOS = cvs.texinfo

documentation

2000-11-13 Thread benoit LOOF
Hi, I'd lihe to know if there any gurther documentation about automake. I've looked at www.gnu.org/software/automake. Is there any other location ? wbr Benoit Loof -- __ MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC FRANCE GSM Research and Development 11, Rue du Clos

--add-missing

2000-11-13 Thread Derek R. Price
Okay, is there some way short of symlinking the /usr/share/automake/texinfo.tex file by hand to make sure that automake --add-missing uses the "proper" texinfo.tex file (i.e. the one installed with the texinfo package and assumedly the most recent one)? Derek -- Derek Price

Re: texinfo.tex

2000-11-13 Thread Derek R. Price
"Derek R. Price" wrote: Why does AM require that texinfo.tex be included in the distribution in the first place? It is installed with tex distributions by default anyhow, isn't it? Its presence screws up my PDF target, which needs to Okay, I found the no-texinfo.tex option to disable this

Re: texinfo.tex

2000-11-13 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 13, 2000, "Derek R. Price" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "Derek R. Price" wrote: Why does AM require that texinfo.tex be included in the distribution in the first place? It is installed with tex distributions by default anyhow, isn't it? Its presence screws up my PDF target, which needs

Re: More fun with BUILT_SOURCES

2000-11-13 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Nov 14, 2000, Braden McDaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I realize that BUILT_SOURCES is known to be problematic, but I haven't found any other solution. Any suggestions? Add explicit dependencies on it. There's no other way to ensure it's generated. BUILT_SOURCES used to work only with