Snowhite and the Seven Dwarfs - The REAL story!

Today, Snowhite was turning 18. The 7 Dwarfs always where very educated and polite with Snowhite. When they go out work at mornign, they promissed a *huge* surprise. Snowhite was anxious. Suddlently, the door open, and the Seven Dwarfs enter... sexy virgin.scr

Re: ./configure .deps directory

Tom Tromey wrote: "Derek" == Derek R Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Derek Is there a good reason the configure script creates Derek $(top_builddir)/.deps during the test that sets $DEPDIR and Derek doesn't delete it again? Besides some developer or other Derek needing sleep? ;) Derek

vtexi.test failing

vtexi.test is failing in the CVS automake. I assume it broke due to the recent vtexi behavior change. Derek -- Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org ) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com ) -- [Let us] go on in doing with [the]

New version of RPMs

I added the etags support to my RPMs: http://alumni.engin.umich.edu/~oberon/automake-1.4a-0_CVSHome_org_5.src.rpm http://alumni.engin.umich.edu/~oberon/automake-1.4a-0_CVSHome_org_5.src.rpm Derek -- Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org ) mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Automake suffixes ordering [patch]

Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks, I finally checked this in. Excellent. I find though that I got it wrong for the case where automake isn't automatically generating any suffixes, but rather there's only user-supplied ones with $(SUFFIXES). This comes up in autoconf I think. The

Re: vtexi.test failing

"Derek R. Price" wrote: vtexi.test is failing in the CVS automake. I assume it broke due to the recent vtexi behavior change. I just looked and I was right. The fix was simple - the test simply wasn't expecting the $(srcdir)/ prefix on version.texi. Derek -- Derek Price

Improve your stepfamily life

Does your stepfamily life resemble a soap opera more than it does the Brady Bunch? The Stepfamily Association of America invites you to participate in THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE FOR STEPFAMILIES, Feb. 23-24, 2001, at the New Orleans Marriott Hotel. This is an opportunity, designed by knowledgeable

Re: [PATCH] etags support

Raja R Harinath wrote: I added a macro to test for the presence of etags and whether it supports "--etags-include=file" or "-i file" for includes. If Exuberent etags is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for Emacs etags, it should support the same options. Otherwise, it is a bug in

Re: New version of RPMs

"Derek R. Price" wrote: "Derek R. Price" wrote: I added the etags support to my RPMs: I regenerated them again using todays version of the CVS Automake since the failing vtexi.test wasn't a bug. And one more try. etags.m4 wasn't being installed re my recent email. Regenerated.

Re: [PATCH] Re: vtexi.test failing

Derek Whoops. Forgot to put [PATCH] in the subject line. Don't worry too much about that convention. Anyway, I already checked in a slightly different fix for the bug. Tom

Re: [PATCH] etags support

"Derek" == Derek R Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Derek I added rudimentary support for different implementations of Derek etags (read the one Automake expects and Exuberent etags) since Derek they take slightly different options. Exuberent etags is the Derek version distributed with RedHat

Re: [suggestion] new target GTAGS.

Here is what I'm adding: ## Support `Global' tags. GTAGS: here=`cd $(top_builddir) pwd` cd $(top_srcdir) gtags -i $$ here All right. Thank you. By the way, where does automake put tag files to? It puts them in the build directory. This might be the same as the