I have a small project
Directory Structure looks like this:
/Project/ --- Build system files go here
|
|
|__/project/ --- C src and headers go here
|
|
|___/docs --- *.txt *.doc *.html
Project/Makefile.am
SUBDIRS = project
docsdir =
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Nishio Futoshi wrote:
Hi!
Please use -a option for automake (and you need -f option, maybe).
At Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:00:53 +0200 (CEST),
Joerg Anders wrote:
$ automake
automake: configure.in: required file `./depcomp' not found
This does not help:
$ automake -a
I've an application that has a directory structure like this.
./src
./src/non_gui
./src/gui
In the non_gui directory there are about 6 binaries, which will build easily one
any system. In the gui directory, there is currently one (probably more later)
binaries that require all sorts of
Always create the gui makefile.
Use a configure substitution to change the value of SUBDIRS, and use
DIST_SUBDIRS to ensure that all the code gets distributed.
Rob
Unfortunately I'm not a autoconf/automake guru.
But I think I can state: automake 1.4 does not work.
I can't say exactly what's wrong. But please try to
use automake 1.6 togehther with the KDE3 default
admin files. And you'll see: It is impossible.
You get a lot of errors. And if you bring it
Joerg == Joerg Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
In all cases, please run aclocal before running automake.
Joerg Ok! This works! Thank you!
Joerg But now appears the next problem:
Joerg $ cat configure.in
Joerg AC_INIT(hello.c)
Joerg AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(hello, 1.3.11)
Joerg
Did you read below?
At Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:34:17 +0200,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
older version of aclocal. In all cases, please run aclocal
before running automake.
--
Nishio Futoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2002-04-23 at 11:04, Joerg Anders wrote:
Unfortunately I'm not a autoconf/automake guru.
But I think I can state: automake 1.4 does not work.
Of course they work. There are many people using such releases.
However, as with all software, there are some bugs (both known and
unknown),
Does anyone have a small example project using automake that is free
of recursive makes?
I'm not quite sure how it is supposed to work, so I don't know if the
things I'm seeing when I try to convert a (currently flat) project to
non-flat, non-recursive style are intended or not.
Thanks,
Tim.
*/
Here's one..
I've got another more complete example with installable libraries and
headers if needed, but it's somewhat longer. This is a trimmed down file
from a current project.
Rob
## Process this file with automake to produce Makefile.in
#
# $Id: Makefile.am,v 1.3 2002/01/13 14:16:17
Joerg Anders writes:
Unfortunately I'm not a autoconf/automake guru.
But I think I can state: automake 1.4 does not work.
I can't say exactly what's wrong. But please try to
use automake 1.6 togehther with the KDE3 default
admin files. And you'll see: It is impossible.
Nobody here is
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:24:59AM -0600, Calvin Arndt wrote:
Project/Makefile.am
SUBDIRS = project
docsdir = $(datadir)/project/docs
^^^ use $(PACKAGE), it's more flexible
docs_DATA = project/docs/*
In older releases of automake, you would have to write a
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Robert AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = dist-bzip2 subdir-objects VERSION=1.5
Where does this `VERSION=1.5' usage comes from? That the second
time I see it. AFAICT this relies on a bug in Automake which
has been fixed in 1.6.1. This should be
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:07 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: Tim Waugh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: non-recursive project example
Robert == Robert Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert When did it get fixed?
1.6.1
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:26 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: Tim Waugh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: non-recursive project example
Robert == Robert Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:48 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: Tim Waugh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: non-recursive project example
Robert == Robert Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Joerg == Joerg Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Joerg But what do you recommend to do?
Just relax and wait for the next Automake release :)
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Title: Untitled Document
En
partenariat avec
Le
dernier sondage avant le second tour des lections prsidentielles
19 matches
Mail list logo