Question about your services. ejv

2002-05-02 Thread apdMarketer
Title: Hello  The reason for this email is to introduce myself and to see if there is anything we could do to help each other out Hello fellow internet marketer.  #recipient#

Re: building/installing Python modules?

2002-05-02 Thread Skip Montanaro
>> What I ended up doing is building the swig/python modules with >> automake. ... >> The missing link I had to fix with automake/python module support was >> that python wouldn't load uninstalled automake shared objects as >> python extensions. The solution was to writ

Sending _OBJECTS output to configuration specific directory - HELP!!

2002-05-02 Thread Ray Cardillo
I've been struggling with this, and cannot seem to find any examples of other people doing the same... but I'd like to be able to have automake/configure create makefiles that put the .o, .a, executables, etc in another directory based on a configuration parameter. I did this by hand-editting

monolithic Makefile.am

2002-05-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
So what options exist for making a single top-level monolithic Makefile.am? I can't imagine keeping this file up-to-date by hand, especially on a large project where changes must be frequently made by multiple developers. Ideas? H

RE: Sending _OBJECTS output to configuration specific directory - HELP!!

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
Run the configure script twice. Once from $(srcdir)/build/Release with CFLAGS=-O3 CXXFLAGS=-O3 Once from $(srcdir)/build/Debug with CFLAGS="-O -g" CXXFLAGS="-O -g" Cheers, Rob

Re: monolithic Makefile.am

2002-05-02 Thread Richard Boulton
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 23:19, Harlan Stenn wrote: > So what options exist for making a single top-level monolithic Makefile.am? > > I can't imagine keeping this file up-to-date by hand, especially on a large > project where changes must be frequently made by multiple developers. > > Ideas? I spl

Re: monolithic Makefile.am

2002-05-02 Thread Bruce Korb
Harlan Stenn wrote: > > So what options exist for making a single top-level monolithic Makefile.am? > > I can't imagine keeping this file up-to-date by hand, especially on a large > project where changes must be frequently made by multiple developers. > > Ideas? Autogen based on definitions in

Re: monolithic Makefile.am

2002-05-02 Thread Harlan Stenn
Does anybody have some examples of how this works? And is it possible to go to any spot in the tree and have a "make" do a monolithic (non-recursive "make") build of the descendent hierarchy? H

RE: monolithic Makefile.am

2002-05-02 Thread Dan Kegel
I've implemented that myself, but only using autoconf, not automake. I'd be happy to post a description if it's of interest. The basic idea is to make sure all variables are fully qualified so there are no clashes between any Makefile fragments in the whole system. (I also prefer to avoid phony