Hi,
Is there some way to use the old dependency system with recent versions
of Automake? (I fail to see any advantage in the new system, while the
clobbering of the make output is a considerable problem -- it's hardly
possible to see what is beeing done or to find compiler messages among
all the
> "Paul" == Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> Anyone know who is the keeper of the most official GNU
Paul> getloadavg.c? The one in GNU make, at least, has some serious
Paul> problems.
FWIW, I don't know. Files like this used to be kept in some directory
on the FSF machines.
> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> With a simple test-case I can't reproduce the problem
Ralf> (autoconf-2.52 + automake-1.6.1):
Ok.
Ralf> What is ac_ct_AR? Where does it come from?
I don't know. I assume autoconf.
Ralf> But "automake -v" does for the simple exa
So I have two projects that exhibit the behavior where I have the auto*
tools installed and when I update, say, Makefile.am and re-run a make, I
get the WARNING: `automake' is missing on your system... message.
This is, of course, not true. automake is there, in the path.
Any ideas on what is g
> "Olaf" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Olaf> Is there some way to use the old dependency system with recent
Olaf> versions of Automake?
Nope.
Olaf> (I fail to see any advantage in the new system
That's too bad. You must not have run into the various bugs with the
old approach.
Olaf> w
click here to see more
°´ÕâÀï½øÈë
TEL:+31 623 722 849
FAX+31 619 138 901
ATT:
REQUEST FOR URGENT BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
This letter is important, and requires your immediate attention!
Firstly, I must solicit your strictest confidence in this transaction.
I am a top official of the Federal Gover
