ÇëÄú½«ÎÒµÄE-mailµØÖ·¼ÇÏ£¬ÄÄÒ»Ì죬ÄúÔÚ³´¹ÉʱÓöµ½¼±Ðè°ïÖúʱ£¬Îҿ϶¨»áÑ©ÖÐËÍÌ¿£º
[EMAIL PROTECTED]£¬[EMAIL PROTECTED]
²»ÊDz»¿ÉÄÜ£¬¶øÊÇûÓлú»áµÈ£»
²»ÊDz»ÐèÒª£¬Ö»ÊÇ»ðºòûË͵½£»
ÉÙ³éÒ»¸ùÑÌ£¬³´¹ÉÔÀ´ËÆÉñÏÉ¡£
Ò»¡¢×ʽ𲻶࣬ʱ¼ä²»¹»£¬¼¼ÊõÓÐÏÞ£¬ÏûÏ¢²»¾«£¬ÕÕÑùÕõÇ®µÄ°ÂÃîÔÚÄÄÀ
click here to see more
°´ÕâÀï½øÈë
Tom == Tom Tromey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul == Paul D Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Paul Anyone know who is the keeper of the most official GNU
Paul getloadavg.c? The one in GNU make, at least, has some serious
Paul problems.
Tom FWIW, I don't know. Files like this used to be kept in
(±¤°í)¼ö´É¿¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °³ÀÎ ¿µ¾î ´Ü¾îÀå
º»ÀÎÀº ÇöÀç ¾È¾ç¿¡ ¼ÒÀçÇÑ ¸í¹® A°íµîÇб³ 3Çг⿡ Àڳฦ µÐ ºÎ¸ðÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ
±³Àç´Â Àڳ࿡°Ô ¸ÅÀÏ ¿µ´Ü¾î 100°³¾¿ Test ÇÏ¸é¼ Á¤¸®ÇÑ °ÍÀ», Á» ´õ
È¿À²ÀûÀ¸·Î °¡¸£Ä¡±â À§ÇÏ¿© ¾à 6°³¿ù°£ÀÇ ÀÛ¾÷À¸·Î Á¤¸®µÈ ´Ü¾îÀåÀÔ´Ï´Ù. È¥ÀÚ
°®°í Àֱ⿡´Â ¾Æ±î¿î ÀÚ·áÀ̱⿡ ³ª´©·Á°í
Harlan == Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harlan So I have two projects that exhibit the behavior where I have
Harlan the auto* tools installed and when I update, say, Makefile.am
Harlan and re-run a make, I get the WARNING: `automake' is missing on
Harlan your system... message.
Harlan
adl == Alexandre Duret-Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
adl Personally, I'd prefer that Automake generates Makefiles that
adl shows *every* calls. This would make debuging (at any level) and
adl bug reporting easier.
There's always a tension here. People argue vehemently in both
directions.
Olaf == olafBuddenhagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's too bad. You must not have run into the various bugs with the
old approach.
Olaf What kind of bugs? And why is the new approach better in this
Olaf regard?
Read the history:
http://sources.redhat.com/automake/dependencies.html
Rob == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rob I hacked up an import command. It was simply a variant on include, that
Rob appended the include prefix to any relative paths. It worked so-so, but
Rob I didn't have time to make it work well enough to submit it. Anyway, for
Rob someone who
Skip == Skip Montanaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Skip After executing make distclean a directory named
Skip autom4te.cache is left over. It appears it's created by
Skip autoconf 2.53. Whose job is it to see it gets deleted?
Skip Shouldn't generated distclean target take care of this
Skip
-Original Message-
From: Tom Tromey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 9:15 AM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: Richard Boulton; Harlan Stenn; Automake
Subject: Re: monolithic Makefile.am
Rob == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I looked at this. I
=?GB2312?B?t9DFz6KhraGt?=
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;GB2312;
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 13:29:08 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-Library: Indy 8.0.25
×ð¾´µÄÏÈÉú/С½ã ÄúºÃ£¡
¡¡»¶ÓÄú³ÉΪ¡¶ÉÌÖÇÍøÉÏÓªÏúÌ×¼þ¡·http://www.webpost.com.cn
Title: waterwerx
CLICK HERE!
Dear Friend:
Over 95% of adults do not swim. And most adults will not even
admit it!A non-swimming adult, who suffers a
heart attack, stroke or other disabling affliction, which shuts down their
normal form of exercise or recreation,usually will not
12 matches
Mail list logo
