Automake include archive

2003-05-30 Thread Tom Howard
Hi, I'm just wondering if there is an Automake include archive, along the lines of the Autoconf macro archive (http://www.gnu.org/software/ac-archive/). The main reason I ask is I've spent some time intergrating my Makefile.am's with CVS and RPM and I want to see how other have done so and if n

Re: SDL, automake, autoconf

2003-05-30 Thread Assar Westerlund
Mattias Brändström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > dnl Check for SDL > SDL_VERSION=1.2.0 > AM_PATH_SDL($SDL_VERSION, > :, > AC_MSG_ERROR([*** SDL version $SDL_VERSION not found!]) > ) > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $SDL_CFLAGS" > LIBS="$LIBS $SDL_LIBS" > > This is all well and good and I

Re: Way to install only shared libraries

2003-05-30 Thread Assar Westerlund
Stephen Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am on a project that would like to only install shared library files > (.so) but not the .la files. I tried to put AC_DISABLED_STATIC and then > AM_DISABLED_STATIC into the configure to do this. Neither declaration > worked. Is there a method for doing

Re: automake is confused by its dependencies files

2003-05-30 Thread Assar Westerlund
Ehud Shabtai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My project has some include files which has ':' in its path. I.E. some > C source files has #include ":pt:/inc/c.h". > The automatic dependencies which are generated includes these header files > and the ':' of the patch causes automake to think that the

Way to install only shared libraries

2003-05-30 Thread Stephen Torri
I am on a project that would like to only install shared library files (.so) but not the .la files. I tried to put AC_DISABLED_STATIC and then AM_DISABLED_STATIC into the configure to do this. Neither declaration worked. Is there a method for doing what we want? Stephen -- Stephen Torri <[EMAIL