Returned mail: User unknown

2003-06-14 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
The original message was received at Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:05:41 -0400 (EDT) from rly-xm05.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.106] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: "

Re: readme-alpha option and .90 pretests

2003-06-14 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
[Moved from [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "Karl" == Karl Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Karl> Hello Alexandre and all, Karl> rms has decreed that pretest version numbers, say for a Karl> forthcoming version 4.6, should have the form 4.5.90, or Karl> the form 4.6.MMDD. See the Test Releases no

Re: Making _SOURCES not default to .c extension

2003-06-14 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Ryan" == Ryan Kereliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ryan> When I create a list of test programs in check_PROGRAMS, automake Ryan> generates a rule for each entry, foo, where that entry depends on Ryan> foo_SOURCES which defaults to foo.c. This is pretty good because Ryan> I don't have to

Re: Problems getting dependencies compiled before executable....

2003-06-14 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
>>> "Chris" == Chris Seberino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] Chris> If a dependency of a target is not built, then Makefile Chris> should build the dependency first. That is not what Chris> is happening here. Why can't Makefile go to right Chris> directory to build the dependency??? [..