ChessBrain: World Record!

2003-12-19 Thread The ChessBrain Network
Title: The ChessBrain Network T o be removed from our mailing list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: non recursive includes proof of concept #2

2003-12-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Robert It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called Robert Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive Robert build. I'm skeptical about whether this approach can be made to work intuitively.

Re: HEAD test suite - 6 failures.

2003-12-19 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 20:00, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert Are the following tests known to fail (on debian unstable): Nein, no tests are known to fail. What does

Re: HEAD test suite - 6 failures.

2003-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 20:00, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Robert Are the following tests known to fail (on debian unstable): Nein, no tests are known to fail. What does VERBOSE=x say? that the scripts in lib/ aren't chmodded correctly.

Re: HEAD test suite - 6 failures.

2003-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 00:47, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Robert that the scripts in lib/ aren't chmodded correctly. Why aren't they? How did they loose their permissions? Errm, that was my fault. An oversight in a cvs extracting tool, that I wasn't aware of at the time. Robert Perhaps

Re: non recursive includes proof of concept #2

2003-12-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, 2003-12-20 at 00:41, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: Robert == Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] Robert It transforms macros and paths in an included file (called Robert Makefile.rules for now) , to make them suitable for a non-recursive Robert build. I'm skeptical