Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-12 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello, Hi Stephan! > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:25:32AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > >>Where do we send it? Direct to rms? > > > I'd say assign or copyright-clerk are better (at gnu.org, of course). Those aren't the actual legal guys as far as I know. I'm sending to

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-12 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:25:32AM +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Where do we send it? Direct to rms? I'd say assign or copyright-clerk are better (at gnu.org, of course). Stepan

Re: License of m4/ltoptions.m4

2004-11-12 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Paul Eggert wrote: "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Now for the note to the FSF that explains why we need it... here is a first cut to get the ball rolling: That looks fine to me. Thanks. Okay, there have been no corrections or objections in the last 24 hours... Where do we send it?