Re: simple example

2004-11-26 Thread Leonardo Boiko
Michael Cook wrote: Makefile.am: The usual way to define `CC' is to add `AC_PROG_CC' [...] but what about the others? in particular, automake tells me to add AC_PROC_CC to configure.in, but if i do that, autoconf complains: It's AC_PROG_CC, not AC_PROC_CC ;) ^ -- Leonardo Boiko

Re: simple example

2004-11-26 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Gotta watch that typing :-) Oh foo, my attempt to use fancy arrows failed... You put in AC_PROC_CC, when it's supposed to be AC_PROG_CC. The original error message had it spelled correctly, but the second one shows the incorrect spelling.

Re: simple example

2004-11-26 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Michael Cook wrote: Makefile.am: C source seen but `CC' is undefined Makefile.am: Makefile.am: The usual way to define `CC' is to add `AC_PROG_CC' ^ Makefile.am: to `configure.in' and run `autoconf' again. $ autoconf configure.in:3: err

simple example

2004-11-26 Thread Michael Cook
i'm trying to follow the "simple example, start to finish" from the automake manual (http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Complete.html). and it's not working out. $ ls -l total 16 -rw-r--r-- 1 cook cook 21 Nov 26 17:33 Makefile.am -rw-r--r-- 1 cook cook 73 Nov 26 17:42 config

Re: Installing (everything in) a generated directory

2004-11-26 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 08:49 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote: > >>> "Braden" == Braden McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Braden> html: manual/index.html > > (This should be html-local, BTW; try running automake -Wall.) > > [...] > > Braden> ... then I run into problems in "

Automake and new tar

2004-11-26 Thread Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
Hi Automake hackers, I am maintainer of a GNOME module called gnome-themes-extras containing a set of metathemes for the GNOME desktop. After upgrading my distro I have been unable to 'make dist' gnome-themes-extras on Fedora due to tar complaining: tar: gnome-themes-extras-0.8.0/Gorilla/icons/sc