On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 08:39:16AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > >
> > >> PS: I know this is not the first time, but
I am trying to install automake 1.9.4 from source on my system. The system is a
Slackware 10.0.0 installation on a PII/233. I upgraded m4 to 1.4.2, and also
installed Diff Utils 2.8.1 from source.. Additionally, Bison 1.875 is
installed, from source I believe. Otherwise, all software is as it com
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 07:01 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >
> >> PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
> >> understand why you respond to bug reports without C
Here is a message I recently sent to an individual after observing
that they never CC'd the original poster. This seemed topical after
reading today's discussion.
Bob
Thanks very much for answering questions on the mailing lists. It
is appreciated. However I noticed today that you have not be
In this case I looked at the list of people in the discussion, knew
they were all subscribed, and intentionally mailed only to the list. ;-)
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way
> > that
> > - some
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org lists, because
> > they tend to be unreliable. Not have done so in this case was just an
> > oversight.
>
> otoh, when I do that, I usually get 2-3 complaints from people stating
> that I shou
On January 11, 2005 06:16, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Another approach would be to put the subdir into SUBDIRS, but prevent
> the target `all' from making the programs there:
> [...]
Thank you! This is much better and cleaner than what I had proposed. This is
exactly what I needed.
--
Simon Perreaul
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way
> that
> - some gnu.org lists but not all automatically exclude subscribers if
> they are listed in To: or Cc:.
This is customizable, see the mailman options page.
Andreas.
--
Andr
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
reporter.
I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org l
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
>> understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
>> reporter.
Ralf> I normally respond CC:-in
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 13:15 +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
> understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
> reporter.
I normally respond CC:-ing the reporter on auto*.gnu.org lists, because
they tend to be unreli
Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:15:31PM CET:
>
> PS: I know this is not the first time, but I simply do not
> understand why you respond to bug reports without Cc: the
> reporter. We are all losers with this: you waste your time
> writing an answ
12 matches
Mail list logo
