Re: multiple AM_INIT_AUTOMAKEs cause problems

2005-06-28 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE ... > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-dependencies]) I think that this option tells automake to generate different Makefile.in, which is horter and doesn't include the code for dependency tra

Re: multiple AM_INIT_AUTOMAKEs cause problems

2005-06-28 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
Thanks for the tip and it does look useful, though that doesn't affect whether or not all compilations are run through depcomp does it? Our non-CVS source distributions are easily treated as static sources that won't change much beyond simple build tweaking and minor bug fixing. So the extra

Re: back to directory dependencies

2005-06-28 Thread Baurzhan Ismagulov
Hello Bob, On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:45:42AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > In the message headers is included this information: Thanks! With kind regards, Baurzhan.

Re: back to directory dependencies

2005-06-28 Thread Baurzhan Ismagulov
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hmm. I don't know whether AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS can give you the > flexibility you want here. If you unconditionally build both packages, > there is no need to check for libl1 during src1/configure. The problem is, I have to check th

Re: multiple AM_INIT_AUTOMAKEs cause problems

2005-06-28 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, > AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether dependency tracking should be enabled]) > if test -d $srcdir/CVS ; then > AC_MSG_RESULT(it should) > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE > else > AC_MSG_RESULT(it should not) > AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-dependencies]) > fi You probably want AM_MAINTAINER_MOD

multiple AM_INIT_AUTOMAKEs cause problems

2005-06-28 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
Hello, I've have a section in a configure.ac that attempts to dynamically determine whether or not to enable dependency tracking and it seems to be causing quite a bit of hassle on at least some versions of automake. Basically, I have the following: AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether dependency track

Re: back to directory dependencies

2005-06-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Baurzhan, * Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:59:36PM CEST: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > d1, d2, l1, l2, src1, src2 are existing projects with Makefile or > > > configure.ac / Makefile.am. I want to leave them as they are and write

Re: back to directory dependencies

2005-06-28 Thread Bob Proulx
Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote: > [This thread was started on Jun 7. I couldn't find the list archive -- > http://directory.fsf.org/GNU/automake.html doesn't mention any, and > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2005-06/ says there were no > messages sent this month. Which archive do you use?] In the

Re: back to directory dependencies

2005-06-28 Thread Baurzhan Ismagulov
Hello Ralf, [This thread was started on Jun 7. I couldn't find the list archive -- http://directory.fsf.org/GNU/automake.html doesn't mention any, and http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2005-06/ says there were no messages sent this month. Which archive do you use?] On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:

Re: Generating Test Suites with Autotest

2005-06-28 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hi, On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Giles Anderson wrote: > On 27/06/05, Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The simple *.test files used by Automake test suite seems to be much > > simpler. > > I hadn't come across this Automake facility. Could you provide some > details Ste