Hello,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:42:19PM -0400, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote:
> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
...
> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-dependencies])
I think that this option tells automake to generate different Makefile.in,
which is horter and doesn't include the code for dependency tra
Thanks for the tip and it does look useful, though that doesn't affect
whether or not all compilations are run through depcomp does it? Our
non-CVS source distributions are easily treated as static sources that
won't change much beyond simple build tweaking and minor bug fixing.
So the extra
Hello Bob,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:45:42AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> In the message headers is included this information:
Thanks!
With kind regards,
Baurzhan.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hmm. I don't know whether AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS can give you the
> flexibility you want here. If you unconditionally build both packages,
> there is no need to check for libl1 during src1/configure.
The problem is, I have to check th
Hi,
> AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether dependency tracking should be enabled])
> if test -d $srcdir/CVS ; then
> AC_MSG_RESULT(it should)
> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
> else
> AC_MSG_RESULT(it should not)
> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([no-dependencies])
> fi
You probably want AM_MAINTAINER_MOD
Hello,
I've have a section in a configure.ac that attempts to dynamically
determine whether or not to enable dependency tracking and it seems to
be causing quite a bit of hassle on at least some versions of automake.
Basically, I have the following:
AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether dependency track
Hi Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:59:36PM CEST:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:16:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > > d1, d2, l1, l2, src1, src2 are existing projects with Makefile or
> > > configure.ac / Makefile.am. I want to leave them as they are and write
Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:
> [This thread was started on Jun 7. I couldn't find the list archive --
> http://directory.fsf.org/GNU/automake.html doesn't mention any, and
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2005-06/ says there were no
> messages sent this month. Which archive do you use?]
In the
Hello Ralf,
[This thread was started on Jun 7. I couldn't find the list archive --
http://directory.fsf.org/GNU/automake.html doesn't mention any, and
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/automake/2005-06/ says there were no
messages sent this month. Which archive do you use?]
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Giles Anderson wrote:
> On 27/06/05, Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The simple *.test files used by Automake test suite seems to be much
> > simpler.
>
> I hadn't come across this Automake facility. Could you provide some
> details Ste
10 matches
Mail list logo