Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even Linux
supports FAT, although I doubt anyone is foolhardy enough to develop on
FAT when there are so many better filesystems to choose from. But you
need at least 'sleep 2' to guarantee distinct timestamps on FAT.
I don't think this is really a
From: Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jari Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: automake@gnu.org
Subject: Re: no rule to make asm targets
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 07:32:34 +0100
* Jari Strand wrote on Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:03:01AM CET:
From: Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please keep the
Hello Ralf and all,
[sorry for the delay, I forgot this in my postponed folder]
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 01:35:54PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:40:18PM CET:
[...] So it seems that distcheck would
catch more bugs if `_build' were not a
Hi,
From: Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jari Strand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: automake@gnu.org
Subject: Re: no rule to make asm targets
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:59:50 +0100
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:28:28PM +0200, Jari Strand wrote:
Ralf wrote:
Generally, you could
- avoid
