Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-05 Thread Jari Strand
From: Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jari Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: automake@gnu.org Subject: Re: no rule to make asm targets Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 07:32:34 +0100 * Jari Strand wrote on Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 04:03:01AM CET: > >From: Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Plea

Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA

2006-12-05 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello Ralf and all, [sorry for the delay, I forgot this in my "postponed" folder] On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 01:35:54PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stepan Kasal wrote on Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 12:40:18PM CET: > > [...] So it seems that distcheck would > > catch more bugs if `_build' were not a

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-05 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:28:28PM +0200, Jari Strand wrote: > Ralf wrote: > >Generally, you could > >- avoid per-target flags here to avoid the renamed object files, or > >- write manual rules for all those objects, or > >- write the target dependencies on the objects yourself, to control

Re: no rule to make asm targets

2006-12-05 Thread Jari Strand
Hi, From: Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jari Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: automake@gnu.org Subject: Re: no rule to make asm targets Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:59:50 +0100 Hello, On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 07:28:28PM +0200, Jari Strand wrote: > Ralf wrote: > >Generally, you could > >- avoi